D&D 5E Tasha's Drow Art and the Future of Their Depictions in D&D

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad

dave2008

Legend
Now that's just identifiably false. (Source 1 and Source 2) Sure, a lot of Norse people never met anyone with dark skin, but they had terms for those people, and absolutely knew that they existed.
Actually I am sure @Oofta to is correct. The truth is very few ancient norse people left their homelands (heck that is true of most people in the world today). That some did, does not change that fact.
 

Sacrosanct

Legend
But what @Oofta was claiming is that Norse people obviously were not racist against dark-skinned people because most of them never even met someone with such a skin tone. Sure, the individual statements are not different, but their intent and correctness in supporting the intent are. You can't be racist against a group of people that you have no awareness of, which is what @Oofta was trying to say. However, I pointed out that they indeed were aware of them. You don't need to have met someone of a certain race in order to be racist towards them, you merely have to be aware of them, which the Norse people very much were.

Now, I'm not saying that the Vikings were racist against brown/black people, I don't know whether they were or weren't, but @Oofta's insistence that they couldn't have been because a lot of them never even met someone with dark skin is just laughably false. You can be racist against black people without ever having met one, just like you can be transphobic without ever meeting a trans person. You just have to know that they exist.
In fact, since most bigotry is based on ignorance, it seems to be a strong correlation between bigotry and how much one spends around the demographic they are bigoted against. I.e., if the only information you're getting about a demographic is stereotypes (and often pejorative ones), then it's more likely to hold prejudice views towards that demographic when you've never actually met them.
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
In fact, since most bigotry is based on ignorance, it seems to be a strong correlation between bigotry and how much one spends around the demographic they are bigoted against. I.e., if the only information you're getting about a demographic is stereotypes (and often pejorative ones), then it's more likely to hold prejudice views towards that demographic when you've never actually met them.
I lived in the Middle East for a while, and there were some bizarre conspiracy theories about American and Israeli Jews -- even by the standards of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories -- by people who admitted they'd never met a single one.
 

Fascinating that science fiction gaming hasn’t yet been reviewed to such an extent in a similar light. Perhaps because some speculative fiction explored current socio-political issues in allegorical form? Others however are often deemed practically propaganda.

Just wondering why this current trend of scrutiny of the fantasy genre for racism isn’t also happening as fervently for sci fi. Arguably it has happened for Lovecraft, but surely it will expand to Heinlein and others eventually.
I mean, hasn't it? I don't know anyone who doesn't think Heinlein was an abusive scam artist at best and an outright Fascist and worst, and even if Heinlein himself wasn't a Fascist, Starship Troopers is certainly a fashy book. I mean back in the 90s Starship Troopers the movie came out specifically to mock the book and Heinlein's attitudes.

Meanwhile, as a Star Trek fan, we criticize Star Trek's takes on race (and gender and disability) all day long, even while loving the source material. Steve Shives makes a career out of that. I mean Let That Be Your Last Battlefield may have been revolutionary when it came out, but it is rather bothsides and victim blamey regarding racial domination. And the less said about Code of Honor, the better.

If this hasn't moved into sci-fi gaming, it's because sci-fi gaming is far, far less prominent than D&D.
 

FitzTheRuke

Legend
Actually I am sure @Oofta to is correct. The truth is very few ancient norse people left their homelands (heck that is true of most people in the world today). That some did, does not change that fact.
I think history has shown that "not leaving your homeland" doesn't mean you're friendly to foreigners - usually the opposite. People like that tend to be mistrustful of people they don't know even if they look similar. They can be really unfriendly to people who look/sound strange. Again, this is not across the board but neither can you claim that one can't be racist against a people that they have not met - they can - they can literally hate anyone they have not actually met.
 

dave2008

Legend
I think history has shown that "not leaving your homeland" doesn't mean you're friendly to foreigners - usually the opposite.
I wasn't trying to suggest that and not sure why you thought I was. Nothing I said or quoted mentioned anything along those lines.
 

FitzTheRuke

Legend
I wasn't trying to suggest that and not sure why you thought I was. Nothing I said or quoted mentioned anything along those lines.
It was part of the larger discussion. The part I quoted in your post was about people not leaving their homelands. If you track that back, you'll see that it was suggested that people can't be racist against people that they have not met. Either way, I wasn't implying what you thought about it one way or the other, only what I thought about it.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top