Thanee
First Post
Infiniti2000 said:I say you don't because the sentence "If a telekinesed creature is hurled against a solid surface..." implies that there's another option.
Hurling it against another creature maybe?

Bye
Thanee
Infiniti2000 said:I say you don't because the sentence "If a telekinesed creature is hurled against a solid surface..." implies that there's another option.
It's a 5th level spell. 5th level. It's doing (level)d6 damage to a single target on a failed will save. That's pretty lame compared with other damage spells, or even the other functions of telekinesis.helium3 said:I understand the arguments for why people don't want characters to be able to throw monsters into the air (and vice versa) because it does seem a bit overpowered for a lowish level spell.
I'd have to say that per the RAW, moving creatures provoke. OTOH in practise I rarely bother with this.As for AoO's, I'd say no unless the caster is specifically using a telekinetic bull rush and the rules state that creatures being bull-rushed are subject to AoO's.
frankthedm said:In effect would an ally get an attempt to grapple the creature being thrusted [adding its weight to top out the TK limit.
Try collosal sianghams.Jack Simth said:Violent thrust can be rather fun - especially if you lug around a cart full of Large Greatswords (3d6 damage each!