I'd be thrilled if my players took that to heart.“A good character doesn’t just help others or fight evil when it’s convenient for him to do so. Even the most generous altruism, when it comes without sacrifice or even serves one’s own self-interest, is neutral at best. A character committed to the cause of good champions that cause in any circumstance, often at great personal risk or cost.”
Upper_Krust said:The origins of the Baatezu depends on which sourcebook you are reading at the time. I don't think being originally native to a plane is as fundamental as sharing that planes intrinsic ethos. As such the exodus of a race (or sub-race) that evolves/devolves would be an obvious occurance.
I think the adoption of the Formian race as the Lawful Neutral archetype (supplanting the Modrons) was a WotC political decision rather than for the ideas own sake.
The Rilmani have always seemed something of a non-entity of a race in my opinion, but maybe thats just a byproduct of their ambiguous identity?
Ultroloths (and indeed Yugoloths in general) have been treated rather half-heartedly within 3rd Ed.
Joshua Randall said:So, uh, anyone want to know anything else about the book? Or is it time to min/max some Vow of Poverty'd characters?![]()
Joshua Randall said:I think the Slayer is a weaker PrC than the Assassin. Death touch is substantially worse than an Assassin's death attack. Not only must you touch the victim, you roll 1d6 per Slayer level to see if you kill him - meaning that Slayers are extremely unlikely to kill anyone with more HD/levels than they have Slayer levels. And of course the Slayer will always have fewer PrC levels than an opponent of equal CR, so... pfft!

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.