G
Guest 7034872
Guest
Old ham.
I mean, it probably was worth it for their bottom line.I appreciate him explaining their rationale and editorial approach of the day, but he does seem to take it for granted that the trade off of minimizing angry mothers of young players by removing options adult players enjoy is naturally worth it. And we certainly know that not everyone agreed at the time.
Perhaps!I mean, it probably was worth it for their bottom line.
Ding, ding, ding.The allure of dangerous-seeming D&D definitely seemed to help market for them and drive sales.
This was a wrong assumption on my part.My statement isn’t an affront to you or any notions you’ve come too. Some things are just not universal facts. Especially when it comes to this hobby.