The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[el-remmen]

You are saying a lot but all I hear is "5E sucks because I play with awful people that can't be reasoned with."

 

[Hussar]

You are saying a lot but all I hear is "5E sucks because I play with awful people that can't be reasoned with."

snort

Ok, folks, the last couple of pages, made me giggle like a mildly concused monkey in the corner. Very funny stuff. Well done you gentle beings.

 

[Mad_Jack]

"but I want a rapier..."
"yeah well you cant fury of blows with a rapier and get that x3 crit damage modifier, so its not possible to be a swashbuckler"

My response to people in that sort of situation in the past was generally to bust out some super-optimized perfectly legal build that would, in fact, allow them to do that and also make the original poster happy, and then sit back and watch them wail and gnash their teeth as the dirty optimizing heretic stole all their badwrongfun...

 

[Cadence]

I really, really want to reply how the one Pizza you describe is Tuna and Pineapple, and how the other is the same kind of topping selection we get offered at Pizza Hut or Marco's. But then I'd feel obligated to read whatever defense you offered and I already know it comes down to the chain restaurants never having the good stuff, and my palate not being discerning enough to notice.

 

[payn]

My response to people in that sort of situation in the past was generally to bust out some super-optimized perfectly legal build that would, in fact, allow them to do that and also make the original poster happy, and then sit back and watch them wail and gnash their teeth as the dirty optimizing heretic stole all their badwrongfun...

Oh that's beautiful. Once, somebody tried that with a guy talking about his invincible Monk AC build. Some combo of feats allowed it to dodge the first of just about any attack or some such. Another poster rolls in talking about a multi-shot ranger being bale to rain arrows on the monk from a distance and take them out. Monk poster says he would close the distance and simply sunder the bow string. The reply was that the bow was +X and magic items are pretty hard to sunder. Which was followed by the bow is +X, but the bow string is not. Which ultimately lead to the rulebook never saying you actually needing a bow string for the bow to shoot arrows. It was a fun time.

 

[payn]

I really, really want to reply how the one Pizza you describe is Tuna and Pineapple, and how the other is the same kind of topping selection we get offered at Pizza Hut or Marco's. But then I'd feel obligated to read whatever defense you offered and I already know it comes down to the chain restaurants never having the good stuff, and my palate not being discerning enough to notice.

Hmm, like a would you rather have a conventional pie from a gross ass place like Papa Johns, or a gross ass topping combo from one of the best pie joints in town?

 

[el-remmen]

Just a few more, and I'll have enough to kick off
"5E Survivor: @el-remmen D&D Polls"

Another one is up. . . how many until a Survivor thread?

 

[Ryujin]

Oh that's beautiful. Once, somebody tried that with a guy talking about his invincible Monk AC build. Some combo of feats allowed it to dodge the first of just about any attack or some such. Another poster rolls in talking about a multi-shot ranger being bale to rain arrows on the monk from a distance and take them out. Monk poster says he would close the distance and simply sunder the bow string. The reply was that the bow was +X and magic items are pretty hard to sunder. Which was followed by the bow is +X, but the bow string is not. Which ultimately lead to the rulebook never saying you actually needing a bow string for the bow to shoot arrows. It was a fun time.

Bowstrings? Hell, who says you need arrows?

 

[trappedslider]

After reading the comments section of some of the stuff from The Boys on youtube, it now has my favorite fandom. Every single comment is done as inverse and it is glorious

 

[CleverNickName]