The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, if we finally get a real cool system for making pineapple pizza, and someone alters it for making pepperoni pizza and that becomes really popular -- will that mean the pineapple pizza people will be mad they don't have something to call their own (besides the pineapple)?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

So, if we finally get a real cool system for making pineapple pizza, and someone alters it for making pepperoni pizza and that becomes really popular -- will that mean the pineapple pizza people will be mad they don't have something to call their own (besides the pineapple)?

Humans will get mad over just about anything, so probably yes.
 

So, if we finally get a real cool system for making pineapple pizza, and someone alters it for making pepperoni pizza and that becomes really popular -- will that mean the pineapple pizza people will be mad they don't have something to call their own (besides the pineapple)?
Someone seriously needs to make "Pizza Ninjas vs. Pirates."

 

Humans will get mad over just about anything, so probably yes.

A lot of them get mad first and then go looking for things to blame it on.

And yes, in that example, people will almost certainly get mad because somebody took "their" thing, because they've heavily invested in it emotionally as part of their social identity.
 

comes backs from trip

looks at threads

bloody-mary-cocktail.gif
WELCOME HOME
 



I'm kind of curious about how the discussions of changes-in/art-for/plays-styles in D&D and MtG would work in an alternate universe, where we switched who played what. (Or are people just people?)
 

A lot of them get mad first and then go looking for things to blame it on.

Correct, but we can unpack that a bit. In the usual case, this isn't intentional - it is a product of how human brains work.

Human brains have what is sometimes loosely called the "limbic system" - it is a group of structures that are tied to memory and emotion. It is, among other things, responsible for engaging in fast judgements, to protect you from harm - the system that, based on just a little information, says, "Oh, crap! Jaguar!" and the like.

This system tends to return results faster than your conscious, logical processes can. And this is really good for you if there's a jaguar around. Having established an emotional context, you can then very quickly sort through the results of the rational mind, to find one that fits. It is highly efficient that way.

When you do that with written text, that has low risk to you and little or no time pressure, though, it tends to fail - your brain will sometimes establish your emotional response to the work seconds or even minutes before you actually finish reading the work - and material that is not consistent with the emotional response tends to get ignored, even if it contradicts the reason for the emotional reaction.

One of the best pieces of general fourm-dweller advice is, if you feel yourself getting mad while you are reading, stop reading, and walk away for 15 minutes. Let that emotional reaction fade away, before you re-engage with the work in question.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top