The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad

It's a running joke at my table that "Chaotic Neutral" is the alignment that players should select when they want their character to be targeted by enemy attacks more often than the others. It's not entirely true, but I don't bother to correct them.
 
Last edited:


I get the image in my head of them saying "Dude, check it out!" As most of the D&D people I knew from the 70's, were also SCA types, pseudo-hippies. I think later, we more nerdy types took it over. It is oddly mechanistic view, it does sort of match with a lot of medieval stuff, though I am not an expert, so I don't really know.
The Lake Geneva people seem to have been fairly square, from what I have learned over the years, really not hippies in the slightest.

I am an expert on Medieval cosmological stuff, and it is way weirder than the AD&D DMG.
 


Clearly BS, since it says that I am Neutral Good:

Neutral Good means doing what is good without bias for or against order. However, a Neutral Good alignment can be dangerous when it advances mediocrity by limiting the actions of the truly capable.
 


I will say, even though I don't like alignment, my favorite take on it is Matt Colville's explanation of it.
For me, it is a very helpful prompt to help with acting improv. If you look at, say, the royal court of the Dwendalian Empire in the Explorer's Guide to Wildemount, knowing that one royal advisor is Neutral Good while another is Lawful Evil can really help with knowing how to run then in response to player actions.
 

I will say, even though I don't like alignment, my favorite take on it is Matt Colville's explanation of it.
I did the pizza quiz:
Neutral Good, "Benefactor"
Neutral Good means doing what is good without bias for or against order. However, a Neutral Good alignment can be dangerous when it advances mediocrity by limiting the actions of the truly capable.
With alignment, I will always respect it for teaching me the term "diametrically opposed" nevertheless, having to attack another alignment like rabid weasels because of it, is not how I play, even though some do? What is Colville's take?
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top