A whole lot of internet arguments seem to boil down to people going out of their way to find some pointlessly stupid thing to argue about and/or willfully reading others’ posts in the worst way possible in order to argue. “But you didn’t say ‘in my opinion’ at the start of your post…” is a clear example of that. If someone’s that pedantic they’re not worth responding to.Sometimes people just need to read comments with a bit of a more generous attitude, instead of jumping to the conclusion that someone is stating what they think is an objective fact![]()
That's something I learnt, long ago, when writing business communications. It carries over into my daily life. Whether or not I intend to write as if trying to steer someone to my school of thought it seems to come out that way, though that shouldn't be interpreted as my attempting to present something as fact. If it is then that's on the reader, not me. There's a definite difference.Funny, when I teach writing I tell students to get rid of qualifiers like "I think" unless absolutely necessary in favor of 1. a more confident tone in your writing, and 2. using more engaging qualifiers that brings your reader into the way you are thinking. So for example, instead of "I think pineapple pizza is good," something like, "It is important to consider that pineapple pizza is good, in order to. . ."
At times I have essentially been forced to say "in my opinion" because someone has been wilfully interpreting my statements of opinion, as if I was presenting them as fact.A whole lot of internet arguments seem to boil down to people going out of their way to find some pointlessly stupid thing to argue about and/or willfully reading others’ posts in the worst way possible in order to argue. “But you didn’t say ‘in my opinion’ at the start of your post…” is a clear example of that. If someone’s that pedantic they’re not worth responding to.
A whole lot of internet arguments seem to boil down to people going out of their way to find some pointlessly stupid thing to argue about and/or willfully reading others’ posts in the worst way possible in order to argue. “But you didn’t say ‘in my opinion’ at the start of your post…” is a clear example of that. If someone’s that pedantic they’re not worth responding to.
If someone fails to understand something you wrote, it's worth considering the possibility you didn't write it as clearly as you intended to. Not all failure to understand can be laid at the feet of the reader.
Certainly not, however, some people just want to interpret things the way that they want to interpret them. On this board there have been several times that I've been berated for AGREEING with a poster.If someone fails to understand something you wrote, it's worth considering the possibility you didn't write it as clearly as you intended to. Not all failure to understand can be laid at the feet of the reader.
Certainly not, however, some people just want to interpret things the way that they want to interpret them. On this board there have been several times that I've been berated for AGREEING with a poster.