My group had made a mistake in how we were doing combat in TORG, for example. We found that we preferred our way to the actual rules, when we realized it, and just kept playing as before. It was a long time ago, but I think it was something about the damage cap. Worked both for and against us.Different people have different preferences and want the game they play to support their preferences. It’s only the “one game system to do it all” mindset that causes a problem.
Exactly. All games are toolkits. Make the game yours. Use what you like, modify it as needed to suit your table, and ignore the rest. I will never understand the ”the RAW, the whole RAW, and nothing but the RAW” mindset.My group had made a mistake in how we were doing combat in TORG, for example. We found that we preferred our way to the actual rules, when we realized it, and just kept playing as before. It was a long time ago, but I think it was something about the damage cap. Worked both for and against us.
It's mostly the tone of those threads that cracks me up.Different people have different preferences and want the game they play to support their preferences. It’s only the “one game system to do it all” mindset that causes a problem.
I find that the people who argue that are generally Rules Lawyers™ who will then go on to claim a very specific interpretation of RAW, that may or may not make any real sense.Exactly. All games are toolkits. Make the game yours. Use what you like, modify it as needed to suit your table, and ignore the rest. I will never understand the ”the RAW, the whole RAW, and nothing but the RAW” mindset.
It's mostly the tone of those threads that cracks me up.
Yes, it's true that different people have different preferences, and they want the game to support those preferences. But when they write the thread, they forget they are discussing personal preferences, and start talking in ultimatums and maxims. It's no longer something that a single person would like to see; it is now a problem that everyone has, and it must be fixed (or, we must play something else).
Everyone thinks their thoughts, feelings, views, and preferences as the good, right, just, and smart things. It’s just human nature. The whole “you didn’t preface your comment with ‘in my opinion,’ therefore you must think your opinion is fact” thing is a really bizarre form of tone policing.It's mostly the tone of those threads that crack me up.
Yes, it's true that different people have different preferences, and they want the game to support those preferences. But when they write the thread, they drop all references to "preference" and start talking in ultimatums and maxims. It's no longer something that a single person would like to see; it is now a problem that everyone has, and it must be fixed (or, we must play something else).
Yeah, that's a comment I've made before. Of course it's "in my opinion." Who else's opinion would I be stating?Everyone thinks their thoughts, feelings, views, and preferences as the good, right, just, and smart things. It’s just human nature. The whole “you didn’t preface your comment with ‘in my opinion,’ therefore you must think your opinion is fact” thing is a really bizarre form of tone policing.