The Lamentation of Lolth - OoC VI

I honestly think this may be the first time in the history of playing D&D where I have told myself..."F' it...we don't need that money"...*L*

Great scene all...truly great...this is why I love this game so much...:)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Same here, Sarlis doesn't need the money and his looking to give them a correction. A whole village unable to do what a group of 8 did should be fairly easy to wipe off the map.

Oups it's true Sarlis is good, Ok He simply wants to get the one responsible for all this mess.
 

*L*

It is an interesting proposition, but even if we did take her down, is it really our place to do so? Ayden is chaotic good and is all about individual freedom, but he is also smart enough to realize that while what she did was wrong, he is not there to to judge her, well, anymore than he already has.

I can also see OOC why IC Seilwoodan saw the logic in her actions, as our resident archer is pretty detached from his emotions, a fact that must drive him crazy travelling with us, and sees it through the eyes of a hunter. If Drogo was there, there is a chance he also would have seen the ends and means of it all. Also, if I was playing a LN character, aka Zeric, I would also see the logic in her deeds.

So, while Sarlis may want to open a can of whoop ass, and it would more than likely be warranted, I know all I want to do now is get away from this place and send a letter to Orchard Falls and report all of this to the priest who is now running the reopened theater.
 

I know that the others might not follow him. I also understand Seilwoodan logic, but it's completly against his so he tries to shaken him up.

Sarlis prefers to die then walk away fully knowing what crimes were commited here. To him what happened here is the holocaust and he cannot resign to simply let them continue their lives like nothing happened.

For Sarlis simply saying "you are bad" isn't enough.

Edit: He also knows that the group has the power to do so, they were able to accomplish what the entire village failed to do, so walking away without giving it a try would be cowardice and lack of self integrity.
 


Well, let's just say Zeric would be okay with it.
LN is the non-zealous paladin.
Calenthang sees his ability to destroy a menace an entire population of supposed warriors couldn't destroy as a weakness in that population.
To be proud of such a weakness is just blatant incompetence.
 

If he can kill the priestess Sarlis will die with a smile on his face.

Sarlis can't back down from this situation without fighting, doing so would mean losing face and proving that he is unable.

I am just surprised by how racist is the group, A hag murdering people has to be killed but tracherous and cunning elves fooling innocents to the butcher can be forgiven simply by telling them how bad they are.

Sorry but Sarlis morality can't accept that :)
 

He… Dunstandis not a racist, he killed the hag so HE would not get killed. The only reason why he doesn’t fight with elves is because the never try to stick pointy bits in him. Well hardly ever, the streets of Westgate will even turn an honest elf’s integrity a bit pear-shaped. :)
 

This is interesting. I can see Sarlis' point. Drogo's not around to act or reason either way. Majin will let me know if he can hear any commotion from out in the woods. He wouldn't have gone far from the site of the fair. He just would go far enough for some privacy. In every good campaign, a PC dies here or there...
 

Well its an interesting conundrum, I will give you that. Broddy's attitude would probably be a replused indifference.

While its not the nicest thing to do, the fact of the matter is that they had no other choice (supposedly) so he would see it as a lesser of two evils but he definately wouldn't be happy about it.

I see that Broddy doesn't have a write up about him in the RG, I thought I had done one for him. I will have to check and if not get one up ASAP.
 

Remove ads

Top