Villano
First Post
Tarrasque Wrangler said:This is getting a little too close to political. I honestly wasn't trying to steer it in that direction, and I hope you weren't either, Villano. Maybe we should quit while we're ahead. Agreed?
Yeah, I left it off my original list because I was worried that it would be considered "political", but, like I said, politics has nothing to do with my annoyance with it.
We can drop it, though, to keep the thread safe.
I just read an article about how many documentarians are bemoaning the fact that many docs cited by the Academy are becoming more and more "cinematized", punched up for the public. This is blurring the line between truth and fiction, and seems to not be a problem invented by Michael Moore. Not that this excuses any alleged liberties he's taken in making his films, but it does point out how vigilant we as consumers of media need to be.
Exactly. I have the same proble with biopics. Granted, you can expect some streamlining of someone's life in order to fit in a movie's running time, but sometimes they go overboard. I remember reading a review of a film (I can't recall which one) in which it was pointed out that they producers strangely altered the name of one person. Nothing else was altered, just his name. And I believe it was set in the distant past, so it isn't like the person was going to sue.
This reminds me of an article in which the author said that if a big studio were to film the battle of Gettysburg today, it would end with Lee and Grant in a swordfight to the death amid the burning ruins of Atlanta.
