WayneLigon
Adventurer
Tarrasque Wrangler said:My problem with this is that it undermines the whole point of criticism. One should be able to hold up anything, be it movie, album, book, or whatever, and objectively determine whether it's good or not.
I can both agree and disagree. I think there are some films, as with most things, that you can point at and say 'this is a good thing' for the same reason that you can look at a well-balanced meal prepared by a five-star chef and say 'this is better' than McDonald's.
I doubt there is a set of objective tools anyone could agree on to do this job in film, or any other art work. Any form of art is subjective; that's the point of art.
Look at many of the films that we today regard as classics, such as The Wizard of Oz or It's a Wonderful Life. These and a number of others were poorly received when first released. (I don't know how much box office they took in at the time, though; that tends to be a better - though not the only - indicator in my book. People go to see films that others tell them were good.) Standards were different, tastes were different. Forty years from now, people will probably be shaking their heads and calling us deluded fools for not seeing the comic genius of Ernest.
American Beauty
Can't imagine what was offensive in it. It was pretty darn funny, ironic, etc.
Last edited: