Krug
Newshound
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=17355
There's another review on the site which says the same...
There's another review on the site which says the same...
That right there is what convinced me this was gonna suck when I first heard tidbits about the movie a year ago. It just smacked of studio interference and/or a writer who didn't "get" the character. I mean, the New York location, that's negotiable (I guess). But Frank HAS to be a Marine. That's key to the whole character. He doesn't approach stopping crime the way a cop or fed would - he approaches it the way a soldier would.CrusaderX said:And keep him as an ex-Marine. And keep him in New York, not Florida.
That makes me think about crossover movies. But I guess its too early for a Spidey/X-Men movie.Umbran said:I haven't seen the new movie, but I have $0.02 anyway....
The problem with the Punisher movies is very simple - the thing that made the original character interesting was that he was a normal (if somewhat psychotic) guy in a 4-color superhero universe. When you take away the contrasts (both in powers and in morals and ethics) between the Punisher and the heroes, you lose most of the purpose for the character's existance, dramatically speaking.
Thus, wihtout Spider Man or Captain America or the like in there, the Punisher is just a normal guy with guns in a normal world. There's already oodles of such movies out there, and the only reason for the movie is name-recognition to sell t-shirts with skulls on 'em.
SemperJase said:Anyone remember the 1989 version of "The Punisher" starring Dolph Lundgren (of Rocky IV fame)?
Tarrasque Wrangler said:But Frank HAS to be a Marine. That's key to the whole character. He doesn't approach stopping crime the way a cop or fed would - he approaches it the way a soldier would.