Thornir Alekeg
Albatross!
"Today on Wild Realms we will be examining the extremely dangerous reproductive habits of the Medusae."
Jer said:Where's the option for "I'm so old school there's only ONE Medusa in my game. And she's an epic solo."? The plural of "Medusa" has always seemed really, really weird to me for some reason.
Lord Tirian said:This. Unless they're just making male medusas the same as female ones. Then I'm unhappy. If it's a maedar (regardless of the name), then I'm happy.
Jer said:Where's the option for "I'm so old school there's only ONE Medusa in my game. And she's an epic solo."? The plural of "Medusa" has always seemed really, really weird to me for some reason.
Terwox said:Per http://www.aintitcool.com/node/36838
In the 4E Monster Manual, there are male medusae!
Well, I just saw my first house rule. Those guys are out, medusae are female. How about you?
Right you are, John. And we'll also be...John? John? *knock, knock*Thornir Alekeg said:"Today on Wild Realms we will be examining the extremely dangerous reproductive habits of the Medusae."
Kwalish Kid said:Honestly, we in the fantasy community have got to start taking a good, hard look at the way gender is used in our media. There really isn't any good reason that I can think for continuing to have female-only medusae.
IanB said:Absolute agreement. There's a large segment of female-only monsters that could stand a bit of examination in this vein.