Treantmonklvl20
Explorer
Continued....
This is false. Furthermore, I suspect by making this statement, you either didn't read the analysis of the Bladesinger (past the ratings themselves), or you are unfamiliar with what a "god wizard" is.
Simply stated, my analysis of the Bladesinger notes it's lack of damage potential as its chief flaw. No reasonable person would think I'm using the "god wizard" (which does little to no damage at all) as a yardstick.
Again, really wondering how anyone with any reason could come to the conclusion I used the god wizard as a standard for damage-dealing of a melee build. Again, I'm suspicious you didn't actually read the evaluation.
OK, your in-depth analysis was not presented HERE, nor did you link to it HERE, nor did you even mention where I might find this analysis (page 35 of some thread you don't mention), but you left a post suggesting I should change my review because...trust you?
I agree. My initial post links my Bladesinger evaluation. It is definitely "on-topic" for this thread.This review covers Bladesinger. Therefore talking about that is appropriate for the thread.
@Treantmonklvl20 makes their analysis using "God-Wizard" as its yardstick.
This is false. Furthermore, I suspect by making this statement, you either didn't read the analysis of the Bladesinger (past the ratings themselves), or you are unfamiliar with what a "god wizard" is.
Simply stated, my analysis of the Bladesinger notes it's lack of damage potential as its chief flaw. No reasonable person would think I'm using the "god wizard" (which does little to no damage at all) as a yardstick.
Unsurprisingly, that leads to mistaken evaluations. It's like judging Black-forest Gateaux for it's qualities as a Cheesecake.
Again, really wondering how anyone with any reason could come to the conclusion I used the god wizard as a standard for damage-dealing of a melee build. Again, I'm suspicious you didn't actually read the evaluation.
Obviously you are not referring to this thread, as page 35 is talking about spell DC's. You need to provide a link if you make references to other threads, otherwise, we have to take you on faith (which I am not prepared to do)[*]I asserted that Bladesinger could tank better than most martials. It was robustly shown (page 35 of the thread) that at the point where a Battlemaster or Champion is pushed past its sustainable limit 67% of the time (making generous assumptions about their damage dealing advantages*) Bladesinger is pushed past its limit only 25% of the time. *I conceded that martials deal more damage, given few triggers of the BB secondary.
YepI like the Bladesinger sub-class. It's mechanical balancing issues are a disappointment to me.
However, the in-depth analysis I've made of it can shed light on the assessments here.
OK, your in-depth analysis was not presented HERE, nor did you link to it HERE, nor did you even mention where I might find this analysis (page 35 of some thread you don't mention), but you left a post suggesting I should change my review because...trust you?