gregweller
First Post
In a court case that strikes a great blow for intellectual freedom, the US 8th circuit court of appeals ruled that minors could not be prohibited from purchasing violent video games since they enjoy the same first amendment protection as any other art form. The court said that "We note, moreover, that there is no justification for disqualifying video games
as speech simply because they are constructed to be interactive; indeed, literature is
most successful when it "draws the reader into the story, makes him identify with the
characters, invites him to judge them and quarrel with them, to experience their joys
and sufferings as the reader's own," American Amusement, 244 F.3d at 577."
The court also concluded that "If the first amendment is
versatile enough to "shield [the] painting of Jackson Pollock, music of Arnold
Schoenberg, or Jabberwocky verse of Lewis Carroll," Hurley, 515 U.S. at 569, we see
no reason why the pictures, graphic design, concept art, sounds, music, stories, and
narrative present in video games are not entitled to a similar protection. The mere
fact that they appear in a novel medium is of no legal consequence. Our review of the
record convinces us that these "violent" video games contain stories, imagery, "ageold
themes of literature,” and messages, “even an ‘ideology,’ just as books and
movies do."
For those interested in seeing the complete decision you can get it at :
http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/03/06/023010P.pdf
So, a big Huzza! and a Hey Nonny Nonny! to the 8th circuit court of appeals!
as speech simply because they are constructed to be interactive; indeed, literature is
most successful when it "draws the reader into the story, makes him identify with the
characters, invites him to judge them and quarrel with them, to experience their joys
and sufferings as the reader's own," American Amusement, 244 F.3d at 577."
The court also concluded that "If the first amendment is
versatile enough to "shield [the] painting of Jackson Pollock, music of Arnold
Schoenberg, or Jabberwocky verse of Lewis Carroll," Hurley, 515 U.S. at 569, we see
no reason why the pictures, graphic design, concept art, sounds, music, stories, and
narrative present in video games are not entitled to a similar protection. The mere
fact that they appear in a novel medium is of no legal consequence. Our review of the
record convinces us that these "violent" video games contain stories, imagery, "ageold
themes of literature,” and messages, “even an ‘ideology,’ just as books and
movies do."
For those interested in seeing the complete decision you can get it at :
http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/03/06/023010P.pdf
So, a big Huzza! and a Hey Nonny Nonny! to the 8th circuit court of appeals!


