samursus
Explorer
That's a pretty fair point. The only caveat I'd add is that if WotC is expecting to snap up a section of the audience that already comes online for gaming fun, THAT section might be spoken for if the price point is redokulous.
If WotC is expecting to bring people online for gaming fun, they can make a dynamite first impression, but after that it's only a matter of months before they find out about MapTool (or other online mapping/gametable programs), and then it BECOMES a competition. Not that the first impression can't keep a lot of people, just that if it's costing the group $60/month and not doing what the people want it to do (like with drag-and-drop map editing from non-Dungeon Tiles images), a free alternative could sound very appealing.
It might not be a tremendous deal right out of the gate, but the higher the barrier to entry, the more likely people won't do it, or will quickly migrate to an alternative once they're aware of it (and they'll quickly become aware of it if they're playing online). Even if WotC recruits brand new people to play online, the early adopters need to buy in to a certain extent (or the people they bring on will quickly migrate away).
But yeah, WotC could get a nice few months out of everyone who's never tried online D&D before trying it with the VT. Their marketing reach is certainly more than even the paid programs readily available online.
Good points again, but I think only only a small subset of online VT users would graduate to Maptools. And its really an unavoidable consequence for WotC, and one with diminishing returns. I am sure we would all like the new E-tools to be the go-to method of gaming online, but we all know, nothing (except whatever Google does


With Wizards digital track record, I am merely hoping for "good".
Last edited: