RigaMortus said:
Ok, so these women, who are married, that you are friend with... Would you take one of them to the movies? Lets assume your wife had plans one night, and one of your female friends husbands was also busy. Do you think your wife and your friends husband would mind if just you two went to the movies together (maybe to see When Harry Met Sally)? And be honest...
I can be perfectly honest... no, they wouldn't mind. How do I know? Because it's come up. Several times. We've gone to movies, lunch, and other stuff. Similarly, I've trusted my wife when the tables are turned.
It comes down to, I guess, my definition of friendship. Friendship, to me, is having someone whose well-being you care about and whose company you enjoy. Plain and simple, sex and other such things do not enter into it... being friends with someone because of the potential for sex seems more, well, like selfishness than friendship.
But lest you think this is only because I'm married, I again refer you to the example of high school. I've always been like this - from high school on, I went on lots of dates with "friends" for no reason other than to just "hang out." Throughout HS and college, there were dozens of girls whom I went to the movies with or had lunch or dinner with whom I was friends with and the expectation was simply, "we'll see a good movie" or "we'll have a nice meal and/or chat" and nothing else (on both sides). It's quite possible.
I have to agree with Eric and some of the others - I believe you have a much greater deal of control over your emotions and hormones than some would like to think. I am a firm believer that "no one ever just 'falls in love' - they are looking to fall in love if they do."
Different mindset, I guess. I have never really seen women much as objects to gratify sexual desires. I have seen them as humans... and with that viewpoint, being friends w/o tension is easy. Though I would agree wholeheartedly with Teflon Billy... a "friendship" where one "friend" is entertaining thoughts of a... um... carnal nature and the other one isn't IS a recipe for disaster. I think once you stop objectifying someone, you can be friends without any problems (or if you don't objectify them in the first place). By the same token, I would suggest that you really can't have a friendship with someone you objectify. My wife and I do have a relationship a notch higher than friendship (obviously, we have 2 kids! LOL!) but I don't see her as a means to objectify my desires. She's not "mine" to do with as I please. Intercourse refines and uplifts our friendship, it's not the end-all-be-all. The important thing is the relationship; the sex is a "side benefit" that is not required (though it is nice) - trust me, with 2 little kids, there's precious little time alone for my wife and myself (our anniversary on Monday consisted of cleaning the house and wiping blurped up milk from our not-quite-two-month-old's chin), yet our relationship is growing stronger, not weaker.
I think, really, the question is, "how do you see sex?" Is it an end in and of itself and is the friendship a means to that end? Or is it a means to expression of true devotion and a higher level of friendship. If you see it as an end, you'll have a tough time with friends of the opposite sex. If you see it as a means to a different end, you won't - because I have no intention of getting to the "end" of expressing true devotion and a higher level of friendship to anyone but my wife.
--The Sigil