What are you reading in 2024?

I've heard a lot of people talk about this like it's something utterly unnuanced and absolutely axiomatic. Exposition is bad; show, don't tell; keep the action going, etc. It's amateurish advice, as evidenced by the fact that a lot of classic works of fiction utilize the very things those heuristics say to avoid, and still became classics anyway (nor do I believe that they did so in spite of the expository sections of their writing).
An excellent example would be the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Series, which consists I would say mostly of plot-irrelevant exposition from the titular book-within-a-book
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Vael

Legend
So this is apparently the year for me reading books about people waking up on spaceships with no memory. In that I've now read two (any suggestions for a third?). The first was Project Hail Mary, which I loved and brought up earlier, but I just finished The Darkness Outside Us by Eliot Schrefer, a far queerer novel than PHM, and also went in a much weirder direction. I did enjoy it a lot, and was quite pleasantly surprised by it.

On the non-fiction front, I'm reading through Tasting History by Max Miller. It's a collection of recipes (modernized and such) from human history and is an interesting read. I do recommend his Youtube channel, there's several interesting videos there.
 

overgeeked

B/X Known World
On the non-fiction front, I'm reading through Tasting History by Max Miller. It's a collection of recipes (modernized and such) from human history and is an interesting read. I do recommend his Youtube channel, there's several interesting videos there.
My wife and I love his channel. I got that cookbook for her as a birthday present when it came out. We still haven’t made anything from it. We should fix that.
 

Richards

Legend
So this is apparently the year for me reading books about people waking up on spaceships with no memory. In that I've now read two (any suggestions for a third?).
Greg Bear has a novel, Hull Zero Three, that fits your qualifications. I recommend it only as a story about someone waking up on a spaceship with no memory - I didn't particularly enjoy it.

Johnathan
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
Just finished Vandermeer's Absolution.

The three parts aren't even in quality -- I get what he was trying to do in the third segment, but the point of view character's internal monologue is so annoying, it's distracting -- but overall, it's very good.

The first three Southern Reach novels -- Annihilation, Authority and Acceptance -- make up, more or less, a single narrative about government agents entering into a restricted area of the Gulf Coast that is undergoing some sort of mysterious transformation. The next book then zooms back to show the government agency behind the expeditions. And then third shows the consequences of the past two novels as the area begins to spread. The third novel ends with the threat of Area X potentially consuming the world, although that doesn't seem to have happened yet in the fourth book.

The fourth book jumps back in time before the first novel and then after the third, but mostly serves to examine a single mysterious figure in and around Area X, although it took a little while for me to realize that was what the book was largely about. And the book ends a little ambiguously, with me thinking we're going to see the origin of the figure but stopping just short of that.

It's impressive that after years away, Vandermeer doesn't make the mistake the back half of Lost did, IMO, with explaining too much of the mysteries. Yes, readers now have a better idea of what's happening in Area X -- maybe -- but even then, the details and the why are, at best, conjecture. And the figure featured throughout Absolution is basically yet another character caught up in all of this, rather than a man behind the curtain capable of explaining everything, even if he wanted to.

Even more than the earlier books and the movie, this very much feels like climate change as a horror story, although "horror" is probably a bit too strong a word here. There's a seemingly inevitable doom, an idea that the modern human world will eventually be overwritten and -- especially in the second and fourth books -- human arrogance that they can somehow fix all of it, even as the reader knows that simply will not happen.

This isn't an essential book for anyone who liked the previous novels, but is more like a small dessert after the first three books.
 
Last edited:

overgeeked

B/X Known World
I just finished Aliens: Nightmare Asylum. The second in a trilogy of Aliens tie-in novels adapted from graphic novels. Again it was a pretty good, fast-paced story with a lot of visual storytelling. I’ll definitely finish out the trilogy at some point, just not sure if it’s next on the list.

ETA: Just realized I forgot to mention to plot. Wilks and Billie are on the run and come across a military installation where the seemingly genius and utterly paranoid CO actually “tames” some aliens. It goes much better, much worse, and much weirder than that might suggest.
 
Last edited:



Alzrius

The EN World kitten
I just finished Aliens: Nightmare Asylum. The second in a trilogy of Aliens tie-in novels adapted from graphic novels. Again it was a pretty good, fast-paced story with a lot of visual storytelling. I’ll definitely finish out the trilogy at some point, just not sure if it’s next on the list.

ETA: Just realized I forgot to mention to plot. Wilks and Billie are on the run and come across a military installation where the seemingly genius and utterly paranoid CO actually “tames” some aliens. It goes much better, much worse, and much weirder than that might suggest.
Ah, this is the one with General Spears as the bad guy, right? I remember that one got rather unhinged in places, like his getting turned on while stroking his fingers across one of the unhatched xenomorph eggs. A good way to show that he was deranged, I suppose.
 


Remove ads

Top