What do you consider generally unquestionable sources of rules interpretation?

What do you consider to be generally unquestionable sources of rules interpretation?

  • Rules of the Game

    Votes: 44 34.1%
  • Main Rules FAQ/Sage Advice

    Votes: 38 29.5%
  • Errata

    Votes: 83 64.3%
  • WOTC books other then PHB & DMG

    Votes: 42 32.6%
  • Hypersmurf

    Votes: 64 49.6%


log in or register to remove this ad

When I'm playing in an RPGA campaign: The FAQ, the errata, and whatever campaign document contains the rulings specific for that campaign.

Otherwise it's me. :)
 



Rystil Arden said:
On a side note, I'd say that this:
As a side note: Maybe it's just me, but that looks like an unecessary personal jab. Not normally your style, Ryst.
 

Jdvn1 said:
As a side note: Maybe it's just me, but that looks like an unecessary personal jab. Not normally your style, Ryst.

Given the number of minor jabs from Babknight, I wouldn't say it was a suprising one. I assumed he was kiding when he asked who hypersmurf was.
 

TheEvil said:
Given the number of minor jabs from Babknight, I wouldn't say it was a suprising one. I assumed he was kiding when he asked who hypersmurf was.
Just because the other guy does it doesn't make it right. I've known Rystil his entire time on the boards and think that he's a nicer guy than that.

Besides, if you ask a question like that in this forum, everyone already knows you're new. What's the point?
 

Jdvn1 said:
As a side note: Maybe it's just me, but that looks like an unecessary personal jab. Not normally your style, Ryst.
Actually, I don't really consider it to be a jab. Just my opinion on that, though, and I know that some of the views I hold on such things are not always standard.
 

I thought it was concise and witty myself. It made perfect sense given the context. Showing an absurdity in action.. and fairly nicely I thought given the circumstances ;)
 


Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top