What Do You Think Of As "Modern TTRPG Mechanics"?

[Umbran]

The class-character can also attempt stuff that is not covered by an ability of their class. The playbook one has to stick to the moves of its playbook. That is why I mentioned TRRPG as a giant state machine earlier

But, this is inaccurate.

The typical thing for a playbook is, you, the player, narrate trying to do whatever you want. If/when what you are trying to do matches a move, then we roll dice for the move.

 

[TwoSix]

Interesting that you say this.

I came to like race as class (especially ACKS style, with multiple classes for each race) when I embraced the idea that (in a race-as-class type system) your class is not merely what you do, it's what you are.

I would agree with this. I've long been strongly against the idea of class as "vocation" that thousands of NPCs within a setting just happen to share. I've since moved into using class as an explicit diegetic concept, and allowing it to be explored within the fiction has made me much happier about class-based games.

 

[TreChriron]

My interjection;

If I use the term "modern" to describe my game, and you want to buy it? My game is modern. It's "innovative" and "delightful".

If I use the term "modern" to describe my game, and you don't want to buy it? I retract my statement. My game isn't modern. It's "classic". Like a fine aged wine.

If someone could invent a title page for a PDF or physical book that dynamically changes descriptors based on the audience's desire, that would be great. Thanks.

 

[Micah Sweet]

I'm cool with that so long as you have a single human class.

So you're cool with multiple nonhuman classes (as suggested in the post to which you responded), but only want one human class?

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

So you're cool with multiple nonhuman classes (as suggested in the post to which you responded), but only want one human class?

In fairness, one of the true joys of playing B/X was being able to walk up to a soulless, dead-eyed elf and telling 'em, "You've got no class."

 

[Micah Sweet]

In fairness, one of the true joys of playing B/X was being able to walk up to a soulless, dead-eyed elf and telling 'em, "You've got no class."

The whole, "elves have no souls" joke made the rounds many times in my long-running 1e group.

 

[Deadstop]

The whole, "elves have no souls" joke made the rounds many times in my long-running 1e group.

I do think that both Tolkien and Gygax (much as the latter might not care for the comparison) pushed their elves a bit away from being humans in cosplay by having them be spiritually and theologically distinct. Like, yeah, they’re people you can interact with, in a much more “their country is literally over there, we have a military alliance with them” way than most folkloric elves — but they are still not like humans in fundamental ways. The way the innermost part of them functions, and what happens to them when they die, follow entirely different rules than what we understand.