Treebore said:Why is it a great module? Simply because I like it. Thats all it needs to be a great module, for me.
If I wanted to kill parties, it's not hard. I simply run any party of first level characters through Bastion of Broken Souls or the like. It's easy to kill them. RA is random death in lots of places, at least from what I remember of the first module, and has more in common with video games where you find a trap by dying, and reload from save to work around it.Nightfall said:Voc,
Yeah but it also comes down to if you like to kill off a number of parties at time. Rappan Athuk isn't designed to be a "campaign". It's designed with the express purpose of challenging your players to think outside the D&D box.
Seriously, who said WotC had a lock on Famous DUngeons? If people say Undermountain, Greyhawk or Temple of Elemental Evil, that's TSR from way back (2nd edition, 1st and 1st, as it were.) The strawman attack on WotC's quality has no bearing on whether Orcus got a little over excited when he said famous.Barak,
And I'm not too fond of guys that think just because they don't know something, that it's propoganda. Propoganda is the belief that just because WotC stamped it, it's godlike. Propoganda is the idea that WotC can and does no wrong. That some how, they are immune to prosection for grammatic and statistical errors. Just ask John Cooper about things like Tome of Magic, Races of Dragon, or Fields of Ruin. It's spelled: R-A-P-P-E-N (SPACE) A-T-H-U-K. Thank you. <snip hyperbole>
Nightfall said:Tree,
Thanks for your support.![]()
Vocenoctum said:If I wanted to kill parties, it's not hard. I simply run any party of first level characters through Bastion of Broken Souls or the like. It's easy to kill them. RA is random death in lots of places, at least from what I remember of the first module, and has more in common with video games where you find a trap by dying, and reload from save to work around it.
Others see it differently of course.
Seriously, who said WotC had a lock on Famous DUngeons? If people say Undermountain, Greyhawk or Temple of Elemental Evil, that's TSR from way back (2nd edition, 1st and 1st, as it were.) The strawman attack on WotC's quality has no bearing on whether Orcus got a little over excited when he said famous.
I mean, it's not a huge deal, until folks come out to defend it as being "famous", by attacking other products.
The arguement was that people liked current products because it's WotC. That doesn't really hold to TSR back in the early days though. If you want to say "people like Tomb of Horrors because there was nothing else to compare it to" or "Temple of Elemental Evil is only good because of nostalgia", that's different than someone pointing out that there are typo's in Fields of Ruin.Treebore said:Talk about intentional disconnect! TSR is WOTC. Bought and paid for. Next your going to say WOTC isn't WOTC because Hasbro bought them.
It may be long lasting, but since the world will end in 2011, we'll never know!Anyways, you don't want to see Rappan Athuk as famous. Thats fine. In 10, 15, 20 years we'll see if your right.
Irregardless, I own it, I own several copies of it, and I love it. That is all that matters to me. It would be nice if you felt the same way, but you don't. We'll both live just fine.