James Gasik
We don't talk about Pun-Pun
Yeah, exactly like that. I knew it was a variant, but I haven't met anyone else who uses it.
D&D General What's wrong with Perception?
- Thread starter James Gasik
- Start date
Again half the problem is that Perception is on of the few skills usable in the combat pillar.
5e, doesn't have "Roll Intimidate to demoralize the foe and get an advantage" or "Roll Heal to end poison" like 3e or 4e did as a standard rule used at many tables.
And combat is a pillar that has the most rolls per PC.
EzekielRaiden
Follower of the Way
Yes, this is more or less my issue.
Initiative as a skill, and certainly Perception, is clear, specific, and consistent in its applicability. Perception is useful whenever you are in an environment where you don't necessarily know all the information...which is literally all environments ever. Initiative is useful whenever you are in an environment where combat can break out...which is pretty much all environments. And, contrary to DND_Reborn's claim, I fully disagree that Initiative is unimportant in 5e, regardless of level: the people who go first have the opportunity to kill opponents or drop debuffs on their enemies, leading to a force-multiplying effect: the people who go first are more likely to gain ground early, which makes them more likely to gain further ground later. Or, to analogize to another game, White has a consistent advantage against Black in chess, which is why chess tournaments always have the two players alternate. The advantage may not be large, but it is always present.
The reason Perception is always desirable on as many people as you can get has nothing to do with succeeding on more rolls (though that is of course useful.) It's down to two very simple things, one mathematical, one practical:
- The more characters who can attempt to observe something, the more likely it is that you will in fact actually observe it. Of course, odds aren't too bad if every single person attempts it, but that leads to...
- You can't guarantee every person gets a chance to observe. Sometimes, only one or two people are in place to catch something, or can see in the dark, or in some other way actually get a chance to try. The more proficient people you have, the better-protected you are against "the guy in front could've seen something, but botched his Perception roll."
of course.
There are barely any advice to use skills when tied to ability scores, most DMs would be lost when you separate them outside of Strength (Intimidate)
Personally I think 5e could have a Browbeat (Str), Dungeoneering (Int) Senses (Con), and Streetwise (Cha) as "duplicate" skills for Intimidate, Perception, Survival, and Stealth
Roll Perception or Senses
EzekielRaiden
Follower of the Way
I'm very leery of any effort to outright split up skills into separate chunks. That way leads to 3rd edition "skills that are mostly useless outside of their tiny area of application, where they are godlike." Given the emphasis on making fewer but (theoretically...) meatier choices in 5e, going for a larger number of narrower skills just doesn't seem wise, and outright "duplicate" skills doesn't sound much better.
It's not that simple though. Alice could have 20/20 vision compared to bob's coke bottle legally blind strength glasses but that's not going to help her see that she's walking along an unstable cliff face if she's lived her entire life in manhattan & knows nothing of unstable cliff faces. Bob by comparison might recognize all kinds of signs that suggest the cliff face is unstable. In a lot of cases interpreting the obvious is what it takes to see a thing. Great vision & hearing won't help you beat penn & teller to the punch if you don't know anything about sleight of hand & the various tools used by the guests.
I've tried hard for years but the amount of player resistance to it is pretty extreme IME. The sheet lists attribs beside skills & players expect to do things like add dex to a wis stealth check or they fill it out prof+attrib already calculated & pause to subtract one then add the other to wis or pause to find their prof bonus then add it to the stat I called for it with. Really it wasn't until I started running levelup where no skill has a default attrib that the pushback started to recede & eventually clear instead of acting like I'm speaking eldergod for the first time almost every time a call for a nonstandard check.
James Gasik
We don't talk about Pun-Pun
I'll have to try it and see if I can explain what's going on. But yeah, the fact that one way is the default is a factor. I played White Wolf Storyteller games for years, where this is the way things work, any Attribute can be paired with any Ability, and players would get annoyed when I'd be like "I think you should roll Wits + Alertness" when something jumps out at you suddenly, and they have high Perception.
Not split, duplicate.
You offer two skills to make a very common action with sometimes different results based on choice.
Roll Wisdom (Perception) or Constitution (Senses) to not be surprised.
Roll Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) to jump 5 feet more with STR fail being you fall prone and DEX fail meaning not clearing.
EzekielRaiden
Follower of the Way
I'm still unconvinced, but alright.
Also that sounds rather more punitive to Strength than Dexterity. Dex fail, nothing changes. Strength fail, you're now prone and in danger, and have to spend your movement standing up on your next turn (assuming you're in combat, otherwise the differences are pretty much purely fluff.)
Well if there was a gap or hazard, you fall in on a Dex fail as you don't get the extra 5 feet.
Str check always add the extra 5ft, you just fall prone at the end of the jump on a fail.
Strength (Browbeat) only works on people who fear violence. Charisma (Intimidation) only works on people who fear words.
Wisdom (Perception) could be hindered by background noise. Constitution (Senses) could be hindered by distractions.
Similar Threads
