Which do you prefer

[Desdichado]

Real Man here.

 

[Augurian]

I mostly play casters... my girlfriend would ask me if I was sick if I would play a character which wouldn't eventually gain some spellcasting ability ^^;;
And when multiclassing... always with at least one casting class.

 

[Kemrain]

Rogue, all the way... Except when I go Rogue Fighter Ranger.. But then, a little magic is good, but Rogue at the core. Definately.

- Kemrain the... Rogue!

 

[diaglo]

the classes were fighting man, magic-user, and cleric in Real D&D.

 

[Mercule]

Arthur was the hero. Merlin was the sidekick.

Truth be told, I prefer Ranger to Rogue to Fighter, but that's a different poll.

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

I really don't have a preference..just depends on the mood I'm in.

 

[Creamsteak]

Fighter.

 

[d4]

non-spellcasters.

i've played an arcane spellcaster in 3e for a grand total of one session. i played a fighter/cleric up to 8th level, and only used my spells for healing. (a real man doesn't rely on magic to help him fight.)

 

[Epametheus]

Fighter.

Also, paladins and rangers really don't belong in the magic-user category.

 

[Angcuru]

I tend to play mainly fighter types, as I have an extreme dislike for the 'spells per day' magic system. hence, whenever I wish to play a spellcaster, I use my own variant mana system derived from SPD origins.

Grand High Wizard of the Cosmos: "Well, it looks like I'll be beaten by a gang of ruffians because I decked myself out for houscleaning instead of a fight." :/