Which is the Best WOTC Setting to Purchase?


log in or register to remove this ad

Crothian said:
Well, the post did start with a very inaccurate statement. But If I had to pick between the two......FRCS is less bad.


Inaccurate statement? That's being kind. Untrue or at least VERY errorous statement is probably closer to the mark, Crothy.
 

Kuld said:
I am partial to FR. Of course it’s a comfort thing.

So is cholocate but for me, SL is the equilvent of Death by Cholocate, Brownie Batter, and Chocolate Chip cookie dough all rolled into one.

Will I have a heart attack? Maybe but I'll enjoy the rush! ;)
 

Doomed Battalions said:
Hi-

I'm think about buying either Eberron or Forgotten Realms but can not decide which to get, so why not ask you guys which setting should get my hard earned $$. I thought about a Non-WoTC setting but I heard most of those other setting are pretty bad.

Here goes -

1) Non-WotC settings aren't necessarily all bad, but none of them have even close to the getting level of support that FR and Eberron get, and few third-party products come close to WotC in production values (i.e. there's at least minimal editing and playtesting, color art, better paper, etc.).

2) Personally, I like Eberron better; there's a niche for most of what I like in D&D there, and there's not the overwhelming amount of established material that there is for FR. It's possible to own all things Eberron for less than $200...
 

Forgotten Realms vs. Eberron? It's not really a quality issue. It's more a taste issue.

With the Forgotten Realms you have an established setting with a mountain of material to draw from. Not only do you have all the various 3rd edition materials, but plenty of material from the 1st and 2nd editions to draw from. It also has the widest variety of novel support of all the D&D settings.

The campaign has an overall very classic high fantasy feel. There are quite a number of very high level NPCs floating around the campaign world, which turns off some people. It's not necessary to have the players interact with them, but sometimes you might have to reach to explain why some of them aren't dealing with a specific problem.

This also tends to mean that it will take a long time before characters become high enough level to become "movers and shakers" in the campaign world (at least from a power perspective, the right player could be one as a low level character, as always).

Eberron, on the other hand is a new setting. You get the advantage of getting in close to the ground floor of setting. A lot hasn't been written about the setting (although Keith Baker, the creator, isn't shy about sharing his view of the world on the official forums), so you have more ability to fill-in-the-blanks without worrying about any existing material contradicting you.

The flavor of Eberron might remind you of Europe after WWI. A very major and long-lasting war has ended, but the tensions are still there. There is a feeling that the war could break out again if someone does the wrong thing.

It also has a very pulpish and noir feel at times. That's the so called "magic tech" that some players will complain about. The Lightning Rail (basically trains) and Airships (blimps) help capture the feel of the pulps. Think Indiana Jones, the Shadow, the Maltese Falcon, Casablanca and the like. Any of these could easily have Eberron campaigns based on their flavor.

Magic is more common in Eberron that other campaign settings. However, it's a much lower level magic. High level magic is very, very rare and usually in the hands of the enemies.

Indeed, NPCs are much lower level that in other campaigns. Very few NPCs over over 10th level. Also, NPCs are very likely to have NPC classes. In other campaigns an officer in an army is likely a medium level fighter, but in Eberron he probably is a warrior with perhaps a level or two of fighter (if he's a heroic character of his own right).

Because of this the players can quickly become "movers and shakers" in the campaign world. Eberron is a risky choice for those who count on high level NPCs to keep the players in line.

Personally, I prefer Eberron. Forgotten Realms never really captured my imagination. If I was going for a more traditional D&D setting I'd likely use either Birthright (if I wanted a political campaign) or Greyhawk.
 

drothgery said:
Here goes -

1) Non-WotC settings aren't necessarily all bad, but none of them have even close to the getting level of support that FR and Eberron get, and few third-party products come close to WotC in production values (i.e. there's at least minimal editing and playtesting, color art, better paper, etc.).

Some day this will change. But I guess as it stands right now, probably not today. Even so, it's more for me styles obviously but some appeal more to me than others. *insert Scarred Lands into the side* ;)

drothgery said:
2) Personally, I like Eberron better; there's a niche for most of what I like in D&D there, and there's not the overwhelming amount of established material that there is for FR. It's possible to own all things Eberron for less than $200...

Course it helped that the main developer, Keith Baker DID work on 3rd party stuff BEFORE coming onboard with Wizards.

G-fair,

I think it's only fair to add that warforged tend to bring out steampunks for some. For me, not so much.
 

Nightfall said:
So I ask, do you think I should elaborate on my answers?
Not unless you're going to answer the question, no! :p

I don't think Wizards publishes the only good campaign setting - though Eberron is one of the best available - but talking about the Scarred Lands isn't helping the guy pick an official setting.

Correcting his ignorance of non-Wizards settings is one thing, but it's a shame most people in the thread are only doing that.
 

Since when is it considered not answering his question by saying "Ignore the Officiousness of an Offical WotC setting!" ? I mean come on... It's not like WotC made the ONLY damn setting EVER EXISTED?! :p

If he thinks every offical setting is like "WotC = God" then I guess I'm glad I'm the fallen solar among the masses. :p :) *joins in the campaign to make SL an offical setting* ;) :)

Anyway rant off.
 

mhacdebhandia said:
I don't think Wizards publishes the only good campaign setting - though Eberron is one of the best available - but talking about the Scarred Lands isn't helping the guy pick an official setting.

Correcting his ignorance of non-Wizards settings is one thing, but it's a shame most people in the thread are only doing that.

He doesn't want an official setting he wants a good setting and was told only those two are good.
 


Remove ads

Top