Crothian said:Well, the post did start with a very inaccurate statement. But If I had to pick between the two......FRCS is less bad.
Kuld said:I am partial to FR. Of course it’s a comfort thing.
Doomed Battalions said:Hi-
I'm think about buying either Eberron or Forgotten Realms but can not decide which to get, so why not ask you guys which setting should get my hard earned $$. I thought about a Non-WoTC setting but I heard most of those other setting are pretty bad.
drothgery said:Here goes -
1) Non-WotC settings aren't necessarily all bad, but none of them have even close to the getting level of support that FR and Eberron get, and few third-party products come close to WotC in production values (i.e. there's at least minimal editing and playtesting, color art, better paper, etc.).
drothgery said:2) Personally, I like Eberron better; there's a niche for most of what I like in D&D there, and there's not the overwhelming amount of established material that there is for FR. It's possible to own all things Eberron for less than $200...
Not unless you're going to answer the question, no!Nightfall said:So I ask, do you think I should elaborate on my answers?
mhacdebhandia said:I don't think Wizards publishes the only good campaign setting - though Eberron is one of the best available - but talking about the Scarred Lands isn't helping the guy pick an official setting.
Correcting his ignorance of non-Wizards settings is one thing, but it's a shame most people in the thread are only doing that.
Nightfall said:If he thinks every offical setting is like "WotC = God" then I guess I'm glad I'm the fallen solar among the masses.![]()
![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.