Nisarg said:If you are indeed the person who wrote those words, or who approved them, or were part of the team, you could explain to us why now, after YEARS of claiming they were no longer elitist; after years of WW people on the forums claiming that those who attacked them as pretentious were just outdated from the bad old Rein·Hagen days, why after all that.. WW chose NOW to publish what is without a doubt the MOST pretentious statement I ever heard from them?
And yes, indeed, if you are the D&D player you claim you have attacked yourself. I would like to know why? Why did you feel the need to say that other games are just about roll-playing, why did you feel the need to insinuate that non-WW players don't know how to role-play, and should be pitied (but not despised---gee, great, thanks for that), and should be "helped" with their terrible disability of not being WW-players, so that they can go from making the mistake of "just playing for fun" to being educated in how to put pretentiousness ahead of fun in the correct WW fashion?
Shemeska said:In other news, does anyone know where I can get my very own ivory tower?I don't have one and I demand recompense for this injustice.
kerakus said:So, who's the elitist?
Q
Barastrondo said:Well, dude, you were the one quoting my "In 2004, Almost Isn't Going To Cut It" comment from RPG.net. In that thread, I not only explained that I didn't write those words, but also that... how did I put it... they did not represent the agonized cry from the soul of an artist trying to Make People See. And I think I finished with "IYKWIMAITYD," because some people had already gotten why it was that people who didn't believe those words with all their hearts and souls might have typed them anyway.
I don't know. I'm trying really hard to take your level of outrage seriously, but I can't —it's like railing that D&D is insulting its readers' intelligence by stating in the PHB disclaimer box that "the world is imaginary, and you are not your character." It's a paragraph or two that was crafted to sell the sizzle as well as the steak (or stake, if you will). It's a roll-your-eyes emoticon.
I live in the South, man; in a state that had Jesse Helms as a Senator for way too long. I've seen hate speech. This ain't it.
Jim Hague said:Nisarg,
While I agree the statement is drivel - it's pure marketing crap - I think you're going way overboard with this. If it's pretentious, then who cares? It's easily ignored. And since WW also produces OGL games and supplements, I seriously doubt they're going to kill the golden goose.
So take the statement for what it is - drivel - and chill, alright? Right now, it looks like the only person it's dividing as far as the hobby goes is you. And the more outraged you get, the less anyone's going to listen to you.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.