RigaMortus
Explorer
Fighter or Ranger?
I would think a Ranger would, but the Fighter just seems to get more benefits. They get way more feats. They can wear better armor. Have higher HPs. Seems like a Fighter would make a much better Archer than a Ranger would, but it seems silly it is that way...
I'm playing an archery-based Ranger now, and I love it! But if my character bites it, I'm seriously thinking about cloning the concept but using a Fighter class to do it. Just to see what aspects are better/worse.
As a side thought/question... Has anyone ever played a "themed" group? Like all Paladins, or all members of a Thieves guild? I'm wondering how an all archery or ranged-based group would be. Not that they'd all be Rangers or Fighters. You'd have Clerics and Wizards too, but their feats would be archery/ranged-based.
I would think a Ranger would, but the Fighter just seems to get more benefits. They get way more feats. They can wear better armor. Have higher HPs. Seems like a Fighter would make a much better Archer than a Ranger would, but it seems silly it is that way...
I'm playing an archery-based Ranger now, and I love it! But if my character bites it, I'm seriously thinking about cloning the concept but using a Fighter class to do it. Just to see what aspects are better/worse.
As a side thought/question... Has anyone ever played a "themed" group? Like all Paladins, or all members of a Thieves guild? I'm wondering how an all archery or ranged-based group would be. Not that they'd all be Rangers or Fighters. You'd have Clerics and Wizards too, but their feats would be archery/ranged-based.