Why do girls get to have all the fun??
- Thread starter Corlon
- Start date
Dragongirl
First Post
Kamikaze Midget said:
Of course they did, that's what makes them men. In the tone of one of our resident mages "It may behoove you to take some classes, to attain the understanding of sex education."
Tsyr said:
That does bring up a good point. I suppose there are other PrC requirements that could be lost too. I would think you would lose the special abilities of the PrC until you could regain the requirements, but I am not sure.
KaeYoss said:Those people are called heterosexual women, in my book (Although not all of them would let them be seduced by just any male gigolo in 5 minutes.).
No self respecting woman allows herself to be seduced in 5 minutes. IMO
smkun said:I'd like th see her try to seduce one of the Eunuch Warlocks!!
Aww come on, there is more to seducing a man other than making him rise to the bait, so to speak.
MeepoTheMighty said:
Not the same thing, but I have a friend that in his campaign one of the characters is a Psion who had taken over the body of a beholder. Problem is, that they psychies (sp?) got stuck in the wrong bodies and that character just found out that his beholder body is pregnant.
MeepoTheMighty
First Post
Dragongirl said:
Not the same thing, but I have a friend that in his campaign one of the characters is a Psion who had taken over the body of a beholder. Problem is, that they psychies (sp?) got stuck in the wrong bodies and that character just found out that his beholder body is pregnant.
Beholders give birth? I always figured they laid eggs.
Dragongirl
First Post
MeepoTheMighty said:
My friend has a 2E product on Beholders, "I, Beholder" or something like that. Believe it says they give live birth. He is on vacation or else I would ask him.
I'm A Banana
Potassium-Rich
Dude, aparently somebody doubts my ability to make an obvious reference to a peice of the male anatomy.
Meanwhile, I would think that most of the abilities would remain. It's a cultural thing that you have to be this gender to be trained in this class. If your gender changed, you'd probably be unable to gain any more levels in it, but you won't loose abilities already gained. IMHO.
Meanwhile, I would think that most of the abilities would remain. It's a cultural thing that you have to be this gender to be trained in this class. If your gender changed, you'd probably be unable to gain any more levels in it, but you won't loose abilities already gained. IMHO.
Dragongirl
First Post
Mr Fidgit said:it's called "I, Tyrant" and indeed, beholders have live births to children who are one-sixth the mother's size and can speak from the moment they're born
Ah thanks, I didn't think "I, Beholder" sounded right when I was typing it.
Gez
First Post
All prestige classes work the same way (unless otherwise stated in an "ex-thingie" paragraph for the "thingie" prestige class): when you lose a requirement, you lose all special abilities granted by this class (but you keep BAB, saves, HD, hp and skills).
So, a female-only prestige class member who somehow change sex lose all his formerly-her special power.
Similarly, an Eunuch Warlock who get the benefit of a Regeneration effect to regain his malehood lose his EW special powers (Mighty Spells and bonus slots -- these things sucks nonetheless, I always found that class' only purpose is to create villains far below their CR).
And doh!, I completely forgot the Rashemen witch class from the FRCS. Note, however, that these witches comes from Rashemen, not from Rashewomen, so it should balance out... (What, my sense of humor is so bad it could frighten a troll ? But it do !)
For ways of getting a female PC pregnants against her will, look at Shark's thread entitled "Madness, Rape, Slavery, and War !"...
Otherwise, even without pills or condoms, it is possible for a girl to enjoy boys without risking getting pregnant (although this require practices that could be banned and seen with disgust in some cultures).
KaeYoss, maybe that virgin-only PrC you saw was the Shield Maiden from Asgard 5 or 6 ? I personally found such a requirement makes it a class totally unsuited for PCs, unless it is precised powers are not lost. Otherwise, she's screwed if she's screwed (I should be ashamed by such a bad pun, I really should). By the way, someone was talking about unicorns: they make poor cohorts for the same reason.
Moe Ronalds, that's "chauvinist".
Dragongirl:
No self respecting woman allows herself to be seduced in 5 minutes. IMO
Not all women are self-respecting, however.
Aww come on, there is more to seducing a man other than making him rise to the bait, so to speak.
This depends on the man in question, I'm afraid.
And so, beholders (I, Tyrant = Eye Tyrant: their humor is even worse than mine) don't lay eggs ? I was sure they did. Strange. Must have to do with beholder hivemothers and hive cities. Well, at least it's not something foul like the mind flayer's way of reproduction.
Is there any feat or class with a requirement of hermaphrodism or genderlessness, by the way ?
We also have the Song Dragon (from Monsters of Faerûn, formerly known in 2e as weredragons) who, when polymorphing into human form, are always female, regardless of the actual dragon's sex. It must be a bit weird for the male song dragon, to switch sex this way. I even wonder if he could get pregnant in such a form (and give birth to a half-dragon).
So, a female-only prestige class member who somehow change sex lose all his formerly-her special power.
Similarly, an Eunuch Warlock who get the benefit of a Regeneration effect to regain his malehood lose his EW special powers (Mighty Spells and bonus slots -- these things sucks nonetheless, I always found that class' only purpose is to create villains far below their CR).
And doh!, I completely forgot the Rashemen witch class from the FRCS. Note, however, that these witches comes from Rashemen, not from Rashewomen, so it should balance out... (What, my sense of humor is so bad it could frighten a troll ? But it do !)
For ways of getting a female PC pregnants against her will, look at Shark's thread entitled "Madness, Rape, Slavery, and War !"...
Otherwise, even without pills or condoms, it is possible for a girl to enjoy boys without risking getting pregnant (although this require practices that could be banned and seen with disgust in some cultures).
KaeYoss, maybe that virgin-only PrC you saw was the Shield Maiden from Asgard 5 or 6 ? I personally found such a requirement makes it a class totally unsuited for PCs, unless it is precised powers are not lost. Otherwise, she's screwed if she's screwed (I should be ashamed by such a bad pun, I really should). By the way, someone was talking about unicorns: they make poor cohorts for the same reason.
Moe Ronalds, that's "chauvinist".
Dragongirl:
No self respecting woman allows herself to be seduced in 5 minutes. IMO
Not all women are self-respecting, however.
Aww come on, there is more to seducing a man other than making him rise to the bait, so to speak.
This depends on the man in question, I'm afraid.
And so, beholders (I, Tyrant = Eye Tyrant: their humor is even worse than mine) don't lay eggs ? I was sure they did. Strange. Must have to do with beholder hivemothers and hive cities. Well, at least it's not something foul like the mind flayer's way of reproduction.
Is there any feat or class with a requirement of hermaphrodism or genderlessness, by the way ?
We also have the Song Dragon (from Monsters of Faerûn, formerly known in 2e as weredragons) who, when polymorphing into human form, are always female, regardless of the actual dragon's sex. It must be a bit weird for the male song dragon, to switch sex this way. I even wonder if he could get pregnant in such a form (and give birth to a half-dragon).
Corlon
First Post
plus some more
Theres a spell, I don't know what it's called or what level it is, but it's a necromancy.
It makes the target make a fortitude same or become pregnant (even men ), in one round they have a baby, women are dealt 2d6 temp con damage, and men are dealt 4d6 temp con damage. In 2 (or 4, I can't remember) rounds, it grows into a exact copy of you (same everything, just not your items) with the fiendish template, and its entire goal in life is to kill YOU
Theres a spell, I don't know what it's called or what level it is, but it's a necromancy.
It makes the target make a fortitude same or become pregnant (even men
), in one round they have a baby, women are dealt 2d6 temp con damage, and men are dealt 4d6 temp con damage. In 2 (or 4, I can't remember) rounds, it grows into a exact copy of you (same everything, just not your items) with the fiendish template, and its entire goal in life is to kill YOU
CmdrSam
First Post
If you don't like it and you're the GM, change it.
Bam -- problem solved. In my upcoming campaign, the sexes are functionally equal in just about every way other than biological (humanity followed the example of the gods, half of whom were female and who were as active and violent as the males).
--Sam L-L
Bam -- problem solved. In my upcoming campaign, the sexes are functionally equal in just about every way other than biological (humanity followed the example of the gods, half of whom were female and who were as active and violent as the males).
--Sam L-L
Similar Threads
- Locked
- Locked
