Vigilance said:Way to make friends, influence people, and win customers Dana.
Overlord, on behalf of the community I apologize... Dana has a singular wit.
Chuck
Bagpuss said:And that's the problem with that list there is a load of stuff listed that isn't really D20 Modern, and much of that is the hardcopy published stuff.
For example the Crime Scene series by Hogshead isn't D20 Modern, its D20 in a modern setting but it doesn't build on D20 Modern's skill set it instead introduces its own, it doesn't use D20 Modern's base classes and instead introduces its own class system. So that's 4 supposed D20 Modern products that arn't actually readly useable without some conversion work.
The Horizon series is the same (That's minus another 3). X-Crawl, Real Life Roleplay, etc. etc. Most of these don't require D20 Modern and use none of its rules, in fact adapting them to D20 Modern would involve a lot of work. When you strip away all of that there isn't actually anywhere near as many products as your list makes out.
Most of what's on that list isn't immediately of use to someone using D20 Modern without some major alterations. It would be handy if you list actually listed what used the D20 Modern rules, and not there own version of the D20, or at least had a tick box to that effect.
DeBracy said:I don't know if I'm the only one but I'd definitly go buy a book with 5-6 "minigames" in Polyhedron-style containing a setting and a basic adventure/campaign idea. Preferably low or no FX. I'm really hoping for some more historic or semi-hsitoric settings (no semi-historic as D&D to medieval Europe, more like Call of Cthulhu to the 1920s or so).
Dana_Jorgensen said:So feel free to play kissass all you want, Chuck. I can't imagine why; it isn't like he's going to be buying much of your work, either.
Dana_Jorgensen said:So feel free to play kissass all you want, Chuck. I can't imagine why; it isn't like he's going to be buying much of your work, either.
mroberon1972 said:Dana,
You have just made a personal attack on a person who asked a question and made a statment.
That was all he did. The fact his answers bother you is not the issue.
Now normally, I would allow you to prove yourself an ass, but you are (sort of) representing the rest of us as a publisher.
Now, while you have already shown that you don't give a darn about your ref in any way, I DO care about my own.
In conclusion, I would like to advise you of the following course of action:
Be quiet. Quit making the rest of us look bad by proximity.
Vigilance said:I'm not playing and I'm not kissing his *** Dana. I love unpleasant people who assume anyone who feels that life is too short to be a Kvetching Mensch is being fake.
I don't assume everyone I talk to on the boards is a potential customer, and thus don't tie my politeness to whether or not they seem to have "potential" as a consumer of my wares. I'm polite because that's how my mom raised me.
Also, while I can assure that everyone you're polite to is not a 100% lock as a customer Dana, I can assure you that 99% of the people you are UNpleasant to will never EVER buy a product with your name on it.
I think its perfectly reasonable for people to make a format choice one way or the other, which is why I am an advocate of printing my more popular PDFs.
Chuck

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.