Heh. I got my opinion crapped on two posts later on page 2.
It's OK, though. I'm used to having my opinions and feeling about 4E crapped on. It's just another reason why I'm not switching. I don't appreciate the "Wrong-Bad-Fun" attitude I get when I put forth an opinion that doesn't kiss 4E's collective butt.
I still lurk 'cause I'm interested in knowing what 4E is going to be about, even though it is very likely I will sit this edition out (if for no other reason than all the players and writers that are hating on 3.5 and the people who still like it after the 4E announcement). I just think it's silly that people think you're irrational for being reluctant to get excited about something that isn't printed yet, but it's perfectly OK, expected and you darn well better be excited about something that isn't printed yet because 3.5 sucked.
A lot of people that posted after me added a lot of things that I agree and forgot about (like paladin abilities that activate with certain types of hits and affecting your whole party) with as reason why I won't be switching (bleeding triggering abilities). I even learned a few things that made me want to switch even less (no more Professional skills? That was a keystone of my last Ptolus campaign!). I was pleased when this thread came up because you couldn't post anything negative in a 4E thread without having half-a-dozen people jump down your throat. I mean, honestly, it's just a game. No game is perfect (except Paranoia 2nd edition, 'cause The Computer said so).
There are a few things 4E will do (or I hope will do) that I'm interested in, like changes to undead and turning.
Buy Mexican Coke. It uses sugar. Send a message to the suits that we want REAL sugar (heck, I'd even pay extra for it).
JediSoth