The Tome of Horrors is a nice book, I'm glad I bought it, if only for the nostalgia (hell, even the art in the book hearkens back to the 1e style... which, IMO, is not good at all, but hey, its a style thing and I appreciate it). But best monster book? No, even if you count off WotC 'ripping them off' (it was their material in the first place). I'm glad I have both the
Fiend Folio and the
Tome of horrors. It doesn't hurt having two versions of the same monster.
Grazzt said:
Blame me.

I wasted space on the Wolf-in-Sheep's-Clothing. Always liked and used that monster.
Someday, I'm going to use that monster. I've always liked it, even if it is a Gygaxian excuse for 'the tree attacks you and kills you! Haha, didn't expect that, did you?'
MerricB said:
I think my problems with the Tome of Horrors can be summed up with the conversion of the Groaning Spirit.
CR 7. Wail of the Banshee (Will DC 17, all die within 30').
3e rules (sort of), 1e instant death.
I love a lot of Tome of Horrors, and I don't regret buying it at all. However, I think it belongs to the early 3e era where the rules were understood, but their (full) implications were not. I'd love to see what Scott (and the others) would make of the monsters today if he approached them again.
Cheers!
The Bodak in the MM has a Death Gaze, Range 30 ft., DC 15 instant Death. Granted the save DC is lower, but considering how dangerous gaze attacks are, its potentially as bad, if not worse than the Groaning Spirit's wail.
Wombat said:
Still, in terms of sturdiness of binding, type & quality of art, editing (especially editing!), cost-to-size ratios, and pretty much any other way of measuring such volumes, Green Ronin and Malhavoc at least equal WotC.
Wait... hasn't Green Ronin had a few 'page XX' references?