Yes, I was just providing more info.Yes indeed it has, but I was referring the the previous year though, when their stock dipped up to 40%, right before the release of M30.
Yes, I was just providing more info.Yes indeed it has, but I was referring the the previous year though, when their stock dipped up to 40%, right before the release of M30.
Netrunner doesn't have card rarity. You buy cards in completed playsets.Does Netrunner have $30,000 singles?
that is a HUGE issue. If I make (made up and really low numbers) $5 profit today and $7 tomorrow and $9 the next day, then after that have 2 days of making $7.50 that is seen as "Two down days" even though I not only turned profit but made above my starting profit.It is like when I worked for the local shopping malls- Every quarter needs to be the best quarter.
So it's apples to oranges then.Netrunner doesn't have card rarity. You buy cards in completed playsets.
Cool Cool, you never can be too sure these days. Cheers!Yes, I was just providing more info.
Dow Jones delenda est.that is a HUGE issue. If I make (made up and really low numbers) $5 profit today and $7 tomorrow and $9 the next day, then after that have 2 days of making $7.50 that is seen as "Two down days" even though I not only turned profit but made above my starting profit.
I can not tell you how many times I have had to explain to someone that spending tens of thousands of dollars to 'increase growth' wont break even for 2 years and by then you may have to AGAIN reinvest some sum to be able to keep it going. On the other hand having a steady income for that time will end up better.
Sometimes my graphs spreadsheets and words work... sometimes I watch as people throw away winners for losers trying to chase a 'bigger winner'
Can I interest you in only playing WotC era D&D from now on?Sure, I'd sleeve up my own?
Can I interest you however in the better format, Modern?![]()
I don't think it is from a gameplay perspective, would the game not be meaningfully improved if you could buy all the decks for $300.00 instead of one deck for that price?So it's apples to oranges then.
now this whole thing is starting to make sense, they are trying to make WotC unattractive, so they can keep it as part of Hasbro… well, mission accomplished guysShareholders inside Hasbro want to split wotc into another company, one of the reasons being that their money would double overnight.
I think you mean estoppel, and the problem with that is, who exactly would the complainant be? Not most of their current audience or even most collectors, who have seen prices go up due to reprints in many cases due to increased demand. In the very common case of once-in-demand cards that are obsolete now, no amount of reprinting is going to budge the price of a Beta version, because it'll still be the Beta version and that's already the only thing it has going for it.That'd be promisory stoppel, you know, the same kind of issue with them going back on their word about a license being allowed in perpetuity... Except milder...
It's a collectible.Can I interest you in only playing WotC era D&D from now on?
I'm amazed people are outraged that WotC is a greedy company who wants to monetize D&D to the penny but completely cool with WotC refusing to reprint legacy cards from the first decade of Magic's history because some people invested a car's worth into cards and would be sad if their dual lands aren't worth a ps5 a piece.
I meant that their public reason to keep the reserve list is a way milder form of the argument to keep the original OGL as is.I think you mean estoppel, and the problem with that is, who exactly would the complainant be? Not most of their current audience or even most collectors, who have seen prices go up due to reprints in many cases due to increased demand. In the very case of once-in-demand cards that are obsolete now, no amount of reprinting is going to budge the price of a Beta version because it'll still be the Beta version and that's already the only thing they have going for them.
Very few people who want the Reserve List gone want WotC to reprint Black Lotus in a tournament-legal form or anything like that, that could plausibly hurt the value of someone's collection. That's a common strawman but I think everyone understands that's not going to happen no matter what.
There's a lot of arguments for that (EDIT to clarify: for keeping OGL 1.0a). Promissory estoppel probably doesn't crack the top 5, even from a strictly legal perspective, let alone ethically. But I think I do see what you're getting at for all that.I meant that their public reason to keep the reserve list is a way milder form of the argument to keep the original OGL as is.
It was a bad promise. It has hurt the game. And I say that as someone who DOES own a complete collection of Revised, including all the duals.It's a collectible.
I have no power 9, no Duals. If I needed them, I'd have to pay up.
Instead, I played (before Wizards ruined the game) Modern.
The RL was a promise. Worth exactly nothing with the present leadership but it was a promise.
Magic can be cheap as hell. They have reprinted a ton of stuff into the ground, 6 feet under, and crushed the value of many manh cards.It was a bad promise. It has hurt the game. And I say that as someone who DOES own a complete collection of Revised, including all the duals.
I just find it ironic to say "D&D belongs to the people" and then say "WotC should make Magic as expensive as possible". But you do you.
Netrunner 2e has existed for 6 years. Magic is 5x as old.I don't think it is from a gameplay perspective, would the game not be meaningfully improved if you could buy all the decks for $300.00 instead of one deck for that price?
But I responding specifically to the claim that allowing proxies would destroy formats, a thing that is demonstrably not true by comparison to a game that does allow them. Netrunner has a Legacy, Standard and Limited format that all get tournament play.
Hasbro's stock is way overvalued despite dropping in the last year and an actual correction to what it's value should be would basically cause shareholders to replace everyone at the company. So they're scrambling to do whatever they can to keep people believing their valuation is correct and going up instead of way out of line for what they are and what they do.Does anyone have any speculation on why WotC's gone so unhinged?
Especially if you keep in mind that most executives at that level receive their compensation in mostly stock. This then in turn incentivizes them to pump up that stock in the short term (as most people at this level are only at a company at that position for a few years). It's why you see businesses make decisions that are only good in the short term and actually harmful in the medium and long term all the time. The only way to fix it is to pay them a salary without stock compensation and obligate them to a fiduciary duty to manage the long-term health of the company.Just speculation, but executives making bad decisions to keep their stock valuation inflated can often answer a whole lot of questions around "why is this publicly traded company making such stupid short term decisions?"
They could realistically lose to Alta Fox and get WotC taken away. That's 70% of their gross revenue.Hasbro's stock is way overvalued despite dropping in the last year and an actual correction to what it's value should be would basically cause shareholders to replace everyone at the company. So they're scrambling to do whatever they can to keep people believing their valuation is correct and going up instead of way out of line for what they are and what they do.
Just speculation, but executives making bad decisions to keep their stock valuation inflated can often answer a whole lot of questions around "why is this publicly traded company making such stupid short term decisions?"