• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E WotC's Jeremy Crawford on D&D Races Going Forward

On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty. @ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence...

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty.


636252771691385727.jpg


@ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence debuff and the evil alignment, with a more acceptable narrative. It's a start, but there's a fair argument for gutting the entire race system.

The orcs of Eberron and Wildemount reflect where our hearts are and indicate where we’re heading.


@vorpaldicepress I hate to be "that guy", but what about Drow, Vistani, and the other troublesome races and cultures in Forgotten Realms (like the Gur, another Roma-inspired race)? Things don't change over night, but are these on the radar?

The drow, Vistani, and many other folk in the game are on our radar. The same spirit that motivated our portrayal of orcs in Eberron is animating our work on all these peoples.


@MileyMan1066 Good. These problems need to be addressed. The variant features UA could have a sequel that includes notes that could rectify some of the problems and help move 5e in a better direction.

Addressing these issues is vital to us. Eberron and Wildemount are the first of multiple books that will face these issues head on and will do so from multiple angles.


@mbriddell I'm happy to hear that you are taking a serious look at this. Do you feel that you can achieve this within the context of Forgotten Realms, given how establised that world's lore is, or would you need to establish a new setting to do this?

Thankfully, the core setting of D&D is the multiverse, with its multitude of worlds. We can tell so many different stories, with different perspectives, in each world. And when we return to a world like FR, stories can evolve. In short, even the older worlds can improve.


@SlyFlourish I could see gnolls being treated differently in other worlds, particularly when they’re a playable race. The idea that they’re spawned hyenas who fed on demon-touched rotten meat feels like they’re in a different class than drow, orcs, goblins and the like. Same with minotaurs.

Internally, we feel that the gnolls in the MM are mistyped. Given their story, they should be fiends, not humanoids. In contrast, the gnolls of Eberron are humanoids, a people with moral and cultural expansiveness.


@MikeyMan1066 I agree. Any creature with the Humanoid type should have the full capacity to be any alignmnet, i.e., they should have free will and souls. Gnolls... the way they are described, do not. Having them be minor demons would clear a lot of this up.

You just described our team's perspective exactly.


As a side-note, the term 'race' is starting to fall out of favor in tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder has "ancestry", and other games use terms like "heritage"); while he doesn't comment on that specifically, he doesn't use the word 'race' and instead refers to 'folks' and 'peoples'.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

TheSword

Legend
So this is awkward. I posted a lot of things on this thread and received a lot of likes. Some of the stuff has been responses to other peoples points while some has just been me trying to wrap my head round what I think about the subject.

I'm starting to develop a bit of an obsession with this guy, who seems to be able to make me feel like a bit of a plonker and yet at the same time a little wiser afterwards once I've digested things.

These two articles pretty perfectly explain why WOC needs to make the changes they're making.

Orcs, Britons, and the Martial Race Myth, Part I: A Species Built for Racial Terror — James Mendez Hodes

Orcs, Britons, and the Martial Race Myth, Part II: They're Not Human — James Mendez Hodes

Please read them before saying WOC's actions are ridiculous or destroying D&D. They're not short, but there is a video alternative for each essay.

What do you do when you feel an overwhelming urge to go back and edit a lot of the things you've written?

Key Thoughts
  • The issue doesn't stop with orcs it affects all the human-like creatures in the game
  • It will change the way I DM dungeons and dragons.
  • It doesnt matter whether things are analogous or not, its enough that the rules and fluff alludes to it.
  • Just because my partner doesn’t see it, doesn’t mean it’s wrong (I should have seen this anyway)
  • There is enough hard baked racism in the game to require a lot of correcting to get it out.
  • Steps have been made but only tip of the iceberg.
  • Its amazing that experts are involved in improving the D&D game and I welcome the steps that are being taken by WOC - not just token gestures but wider scale change.
  • Arguments like 'we just need something to kill' don't really justify the status quo.
Hopefully where these thoughts contradict earlier points this can be taken as a retraction and reversal of some of that - while still leaving the earlier stuff as evidence of how a person trying to get to grips with these ideas might go through a mental adjustment. I also hope there was enough in there that was nuanced enough to still be worthwhile while acknowledging that some points were just incorrect.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Ash Mantle

Adventurer
You know, with everything this is about, I'd love to see more to do with friendships and relationships in game, irrespective of who they are with. Not simply influencing spells, but about creating genuine friendships in game, swaying others through conviction or example of a different path, encouraging villains or rivals to go on a more nuanced development of character, things like that.
 






Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
I really don't think that I would. I would blame the guy who was doing the kneeling, not the 50 other people within a two-block radius who did not all form into a vigilante mob and attack the guy to get him off my neck. I would be more scared to live in a society that embraces that kind of groupthink than in one which simply has a handful of violent people in positions that occasionally let them get away with crime for a while, before they are eventually noticed and punished in a legal, prosocial fashion.
No, you wouldn't. You would blame the 4 cops who killed you, the justice system that lets them normally get away with this, and the people who refuse to change the justice system.
I'm more scared to live in a society that can't imagine changing their point of view to the point where people are being killed by the same people that are supposed to protect us, and the community tells us that we're not allowed to break a few windows or steal from a Macy's because it's not a big deal and is just a few bad apples.
Be quiet if you don't know what you're talking about.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
So this is awkward. I posted a lot of things on this thread and received a lot of likes. Some of the stuff has been responses to other peoples points while some has just been me trying to wrap my head round what I think about the subject.

...

Hopefully where these thoughts contradict earlier points this can be taken as a retraction and reversal of some of that - while still leaving the earlier stuff as evidence of how a person trying to get to grips with these ideas might go through a mental adjustment. I also hope there was enough in there that was nuanced enough that I didnt just invalidate it all.
It’s been a long thread and I don’t specifically recall points you’ve previously made, but this post was certainly excellent, and if it contradicts arguments you had previously made then it’s great to see you listened to and learned from this guy. I’ll definitely be giving his stuff a look, thanks for the links.
 

Zardnaar

Legend
No, you wouldn't. You would blame the 4 cops who killed you, the justice system that lets them normally get away with this, and the people who refuse to change the justice system.
I'm more scared to live in a society that can't imagine changing their point of view to the point where people are being killed by the same people that are supposed to protect us, and the community tells us that we're not allowed to break a few windows or steal from a Macy's because it's not a big deal and is just a few bad apples.
Be quiet if you don't know what you're talking about.

Crazy cops here don't even carry guns.

They occupied the cop shop and had a smoke up 4:20.

Arrests 0.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top