LightPhoenix
First Post
I think the other deceptive thing is that the errata is not incorporated into the individual articles, as far as I know. Perhaps "deceptive" has the wrong nuance to it, but it's the most apt I think. I've gone and compared individual articles to the finished product, and there's definitely errata incorporated into the finished magazine. It's not always 100%... there are a couple times I can think of where they didn't change something, or changed it and it was still wrong. It was all relatively minor stuff though - formatting mostly.