MiraMels
Explorer
The Barbarian-Paladin parallel idea they have been pushing really doesn't click with me.
Agreed. The parallel of a paladin is a bard.
The Barbarian-Paladin parallel idea they have been pushing really doesn't click with me.
I would describe it as a primal champion who calls upon the norse gods after his victories or defeats maybe?I like this path. Play a divinely-inspired berserker who throws himself into glorious battle, eager to slay and be slain and abide forever in Valhalla.
I would describe it as a primal champion who calls upon the norse gods after his victories or defeats maybe?
I dont mind this subclass in theory. It sounds ok. But mearls just rambled in the video. It really put me off how he kept trying to attach alignment to the subclass.
I've had a Aasmir Zealot in my games for a while, great character in a lot of ways (mishandled a bit by the player but oh well)
I think they have one of the nastier rage abilities in the game with their damaging aura, but he's never used any of hit other Path abilities. Though the resurrection for zero cost got used less session.
Honestly, that single facet of the class has made them such a mythological group in the game, far more than any abilities they may have. These ancient, powerful warriors brought back from the dead time and time again to wage war on the enemies of their Goddess, only resting temporarily in their shallow, unmarked graves.
And, it was just pointed out to me, a rotating clergy with Gentle Repose can keep them ready to go at any time. It just has so much story potential that I can't stand it.