for me
personally I'm tenatively thinking
-Spaceballs
-Scary Movie 3
-Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters
-Ghostbusters
-Muppets From Space
Runners up
-Let's Visit the World of the Future
-The Fifth Element
-Ghostbusters 3
-The Whisperer in Darkness
-Star Wars 4
-Star Wars 5
-Back to the Future
-Back to the Future 3
-Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure
-Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey
-Virtual Nightmare
-The Matrix
-Star Trek: First Contact
-The Rocky Horror Picture Show
-Doom Annihilation
-Event Horizon
-Arise: The SubGenius Video
-Mystery Men
-Superhero Movie
-Prince of Darkness
-Castle in the Sky
-Read or Die
-Space Zombie Bingo
-Scary Movie 4
-From Beyond
-Dune (David Lynch version; I haven't seen the new one)
-Escaflowne
-Daikaiju Gamera
-Plan 9 (2015 version)
Whist the movie looks very dated (especially the evil robot), it's actually a lot more topical now than it was in it's day, with the threat of AI making work obsolete looking far more plausible. And hence humans having no purpose apart from breading more humans
As if existing to work, as you imply, is a good purpose. That's a thousand times more bleak that existing only to breed more humans.
EDIT:
Springboarding off of this, and since people have also mentioned Wall-E, have you all heard the theory that Wall-E is actually Satan? At the start of the film all of humanity exists in an Edenic state with no work, hunger, or strife, but because of a plant which Wall-E gives to a character named Eve, mankind id thrust into a world in which they must toil by the sweat of their brow.
EDIT:
I've found a concise summary of it online: "We have an entity (Wall-E/Satan) who gives an object (Seedling/Apple) to (a robot/woman) named Eve, which starts a chain of events that led to mankind losing a paradise and getting stranded in Earth."
2001: The visuals and the use of music are incredible, and it is ambitious thematically, but, dare I say, it ultimately says too little and too weakly.
The
book is incredible. The
movie is BORING. I understand that the special effects were groundbreaking at the time, but it feels like the entire movie is no more than an exhibition of those now-obsolete effects, with terrible pacing problems and no plot that can be discerned without having already read the book
How come when Kubrick or Cameron builds a movie out of nothing but visual effects they're a 'genius' but when anybody else does it they're a hack?