Azzy
ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
I bought a supplement that had some new manoeuvres, including warlord ones.
Which one?
I've also seen advanced manoeuvres that cost two dice but are full of awesome.
Where?
I bought a supplement that had some new manoeuvres, including warlord ones.
I've also seen advanced manoeuvres that cost two dice but are full of awesome.
These aren’t good arguments against adding those abilities to the BM manuever list.
Y’all seem to forget that feats are already duplicated in class abilities. It’s fine.
The Mobile feat doesn’t make the Swashbuckler or Drunken Master problematically designed.
Hell, the BM already has Parry, even though Defensive Duelist does roughly the same thing.
Oh I definitely think "Major thing a melee-oriented feat does" is a reason to not add it to the Battle Master list. Fighters get the most feats in the game, they're almost the only melee class in the game, and this is a melee feat meant almost entirely or them. Yeah don't take from that feat and give to the Battle Master as just a gimme bonus maneuver. Bad idea.
Bard ability is more complicated. I can see adding that as a maneuver. But not the Sentinel feat's ability.
Again, Defensive Duelist and Parry are basically the same thing already.
Also, Fighter is far from being the only melee class. Rangers and rogues are as melee (which is to say, they can go either way and be quite powerful) as the fighter, and Barbarians and Paladins are more melee focused than the Fighter.
Lastly, it’s one part of a feat. Feats have bullet points that overlap with class stuff all over the place.
How much you want to bet the class which takes the Sentinel feat the most is Fighter, by a more than 2 to 1 margin over any other class taking it?
So a similar maneuver would be a big plus for the BM in a game w/o feats - and in one with, he might just take the feat, instead.How much you want to bet the class which takes the Sentinel feat the most is Fighter, by a more than 2 to 1 margin over any other class taking it?
Lets assume you’re right, for the moment.
So what?
So a similar maneuver would be a big plus for the BM in a game w/o feats - and in one with, he might just take the feat, instead.
Feats are optional rules, afterall, as are MCing, and there's a lot of standard options that are decidedly redundant in the presence of either or both.
Which one?
Where?