kitsune9
Adventurer
Hm, I wouldn't mind seeing a split between Rogue and Thief either.
That's a good idea!
Hm, I wouldn't mind seeing a split between Rogue and Thief either.
But then you still end up with the rogue stepping on the fighter's toes and this only works if people put all their resources into simulating the old thief (something other classes in theory can do as well if they spend their skill points correctly). All I know is when I went back to 2E last year after years of 3E and some dissapointment with 4E, the thief worked great for me and I was alot more satisfied with it than the 3e rogue. In fact i was more satisfied in general with the thief skills being class based and NWPs being somewhat limited in scope (not much in the way of social skills for example).
Before I got into D&D, when introduced to the thief I was confused. Why would someone bring a thief on a raid of a dragon hoard?
You don't bring a thief to raid a dragon hoard. You bring a burglar... although you can say "expert treasure-hunter" instead of "burglar" if you like.
But the class was called thief. Thief is low of both the larceny and criminal totem pole.
Was a reference to lines/scene from "The Hobbit", MG.![]()