• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

+2 Sword

SoreLoser32

First Post
If i am using a +2 Sword and I hit with the hilt is it still considered +2 or does the enchantment somehow differentiate between the hilt and blade?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

DM's call, but I would say the whole thing is +2.

There's a far stronger argument against this in 3e, with the precedent of double weapons, though.
 


The double weapon does 2 things: it gives the other side actual weapon damage, and each end can have different enchantments.

The sword pommel would get the +2, but would do damage as an improvised weapon.
 


Long Answer:

In real medieval combat, every part of the sword is used for attack...and swordsmen are trained in using every part. And in D&D, just like HP and most other mechanical representations in-game, Attack rolls are an abstract quantification of all attempted attacks in a 6-second period (one round). That attack roll represents six-seconds worth of slashes, stabs, attempting to shove the cross-guard through your opponents eye, bashing them in the head or face with the pommel, etc. The +2 bonus of the sword represents a magical enhancement that makes the sword sharper, stronger, lighter and better balanced than a non-magical sword - resulting in a sword that's +2 better at attacking (and damage). Since the attack roll is an abstract quantification, that includes attacks with the crossguard, pommel, or blade.

So...

Short Answer:

Yes, the +2 applies to attacks with any part of the sword.

B-)
 


I guess this question would be relevant if there was a 1e monster that required a +2 weapon to harm it, but it had to be subdued rather than slain. Back before we had DR, we had monsters who were simply immune to weapons of less than a certain "plus".
 

It will be up to the DM, but IMHO 1d8 slashing damage of a long sword is assuming you are striking with the blade and that is what is enhanced on the weapon. Plus this prevents folks with the wrong weapon from trying to cheesily sneak around damage type DR.

I've always run it as the business end of the weapon, IE Blade (tip to tang) for a sword or head for an axe / spear / polearm is what has the enhancement.

Also if the enhancement is adding to all parts of the weapon, then any part of the weapon being broken will ruin it's enchantment. I've always felt it was better for weapon handles and hafts to be replaceable.
 
Last edited:

In my AD&D1E game I'd allow the pommel to damage creatures needing +2 or better weapons to hit, and it would do damage as a small hard object (d3 subdual) +2.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top