Tony Vargas
Legend
Heh. Might want to go Paladin for S&B...No class should force me to choose weaker options just to pick a theme. I can be a Sword and Board fighter just as much as I can be a Longbow Fighter and neither is truly superior to the other (yes, yes, Archery, I know, but bare with me).
Nod. IN 3e, the Sorcerer would have stuck to the theme better, because the wizard would be off memorizing non-theme spells situationally, and the sorcerer would generally be able to cast the best thematic spell at the moment, often repeatedly (and more often, because more slots). Not so much, anymore. The wizard can cast about as much as the Sorcerer, and if he preps thematic spells consistently, is as likely to bring the most thematic spell to bear every round, too.The fact that the Sorcerer and Wizard are truly the 2 Arcane spellcasters in the most direct competition and I can be a more variously themed Wizard than I can a Sorcerer is a shame.
Seems in keeping with 5e 'rulings not rules' philosophy, in general. It's the same way inspiration works, and deciding success/failure/roll on actions, for that matter. Great swaths of the play experience depend on case-by-case DM judgement.TL;DR: The write-up of the optionalness of the Wild Mage is not working right. Not saying it shouldn't still empower the DM to allow or deny the class, but it needs to make the DM give a verdict of it as a complete package. Not by granting the power to individually vet each and every instance of the core power feature of the subclass.
Last edited: