• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 5E Why FR Is "Hated"

So, according to TSR and WotC, anything Greenwood writes or says about the Realms is canon until contradicted by WotC (or TSR back in the day). That is 100% true. It's part of the agreement that Greenwood made for selling the rights to FR to TSR. So, right there, the Greenwood novels are 100% canon. Anything that Greenwood wrote in Dragon, or anything he contributed to any website is 100% canon.

Note, up until very, very recently, EVERYTHING published for Star Wars was canon. Granted, the EU had a number of levels of canon, but, it was all still canon. The Fantastic Four partnering up with Luke Skywalker is canon in the EU. You might not like it, but, it is canon. (Also some rather silly stories with a talking rabbit, but, I digress)

Canon isn't a la carte. The novels, unless specifically called out, are 100% canon. The modules, again, unless specifically called out, are 100% canon. EVERYTHING published for the Realms, including the Baldur's Gate games (I'm not sure about the old Gold Box stuff) is 100% canon. This is official.

Again, you might not like it, but, that doesn't change it's nature.

This may be true. Obviously, many people may see it differently. I can definitely accept your view of it.

But I think something that must go hand in hand with it, and which can trump the view of canon, is the importance of canon to the individual or the gaming group. Maybe this is a matter of semantics....I don't know, let me know if you think so....but if I personally don't really care about being faithful to canon, then what actually is or isn't canon doesn't really matter, right?

This is why I am always a bit baffled when conversations take this turn here on the site....because I am willing to toss aside any "canonical" element that I find to be an obstacle. So to me, the view that any setting has flaws that cannot be overcome, is a bit odd.

Now, I say that and at the same time, I certainly have setting preferences. But those settings that I don't really enjoy? I don't have an aversion to them. I certainly don't hate them. I just prefer other settings. But if for whatever reason, Mystara was the only setting that WotC was producing material for, I really wouldn't have a problem with it. I'd either play in Mystara or I'd take the Mystara based elements and swap them out for whatever setting I wanted to use.

I feel like that's another part of my confusion on this....90% of the D&D settings are similar enough for such changes to be easy. Greyhawk, Realms, Mystara, Ebberon, Birthright, Dragonlance, Nentir Vale.....and so on......they're all so interchangeable. I freely take whatever I like from one, and put it in another if need be.

I always thought that's what most people would do....threads like this remind me that's not the case.

By the same token, one of the bigger criticisms I saw of CA:TWS, is, where is Tony Stark or Thor? I mean, they drop a bloody Helicarrier into the bay and Tony's what, having cocktails?

The Netflix stuff handles this really well actually. None of the plotlines of the stories (Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage and Iron Fist) are global. They're all very, very local. It's entirely plausible that Thor doesn't show up to handle, say, The Hand. They're just not high enough on the radar (compared to say, dropping a Helicarrier out of the sky, or a giant floating structure hanging over London - a la Thor) to register. Fair enough. I can buy that Thor isn't concerned with The Kingpin.

But, there's the rub isn't it? In the 5e modules, we're not talking about local threats. We have flying bloody castles and dragons threatening the Sword Coast with releasing Tiamat. That's pretty high on the radar. So, it's not really that unreasonable to wonder just where Elminister et al are during all of this. Particularly in a setting where high double digit level NPC's are not particularly rare. I mean, Waterdeep has how many high level NPC's in it? I don't actually know beyond, more than 2. And Waterdeep is directly being threatened here. Yet, there's no mobilization.

I'm not sure why this is seen as such a completely unreasonable criticism.

I don't think it's unreasonable. I just think that it's easily resolved. For many, it won't even be an issue....no one playing even cares where Elminster is. Problem solved before it is even a problem, in this case. My players don't care about Elminster at all, and never expect him to show up, nor to they ever even consider going to him for help.

For other tables, it may be an issue, but it's one the DM can avoid. If you're running Tyranny of Dragons, and your players say "hey, where's Elminster in all this?", really all you have to reply with is "That's a good question....where is he?" and it's implied that something must have happened to him. Then you can continue on without even worrying about it.

Or, you can go one step further, and actually come up with a reason he's not involved. Let's say the Cult of the Dragon knew he would be an issue, so they dispatched some high level mages to deal with him, and he's been captured/killed/banished and cannot help with what's happening on the Sword Coast.

Or, you can go two steps further, and come up with a reason he's not involved, and then make that part of your adventure. This would require a good deal of work on the DMs part, but some may like doing that, and it's certainly not required.

And I think this is again a reason why I don't think the criticism is all that strong, even if I recognize it as reasonable; you can involve your game in Realms lore as much or as little as you like. Played exactly as written, Tyranny of Dragons is a Realms game, but I don't think Elminster is ever a consideration (I only own the first book, so I could be wrong). A DM who is in the know can make passing mention of such characters. Or a DM who really thinks it will help his game or be cool for his players, can add these elements into the game.

Any level you go with...it's a game in the Realms.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Wow. You come out and declare my argument weak based on nothing more than your say so, effectively an "I'm right and you are wrong.". I rebut with the truth about Mordenkain based on his published history and his creator. Then you declare that I'm the one engaging in childish behaviors. At this point it's clear that I'm not dealing with someone who is debating in good faith. Have a good day.
Sorry, wrong wording. I'm just trying to get a picture of when you jumped into gaming. Just wondering if there is a generational thing going on here.
 

If you want a setting wäre novels are mit canon, take Eberron. In FR all novels are canon, every event from the novels is picked up by sourcebooks and vice versa.

For eberron on the other Hand here's a Quote from Keith Baker:

" With that said, when the design team first created Eberron, we made the decision that novels wouldn’t be considered canon. A novel is a particular story that COULD happen in Eberron… but that doesn’t mean it WILL happen. In other words, just because a novel says that Lhesh Haruuc of Darguun dies in 999 YK doesn’t mean that you’ll ever see that mentioned or acknowledged in a sourcebook. "

That's unlike FR where e.g. when Tilverton gets blown up in a novel, all later sourcebooks will acknowledge that desaster
 


And it affects different people in different ways. Just like some people prefer Star Trek, and some Star Wars. And some people don't like anything science fiction at all (I know, heresy!). Preferences are funny things.
This is probably a good point. I like the Marvel universe (not just the movies, but comics, etc.) more than I like DC. Why? Dunno. Batman's cool. Superman's cool. I actually really like the Flash and Arrow TV shows. I still prefer Marvel over DC.

Similarly, I prefer Greyhawk over the Realms.

The NPCs in the Realms, though, feel a bit like having all stories centered around the Great Lakes Avengers (yeah, that's Marvel, not DC, deal with it) who are just as dorky, but somehow incredibly powerful, too. I could play in a Marvel RPG where the Avengers, et al. were used as examples and continued to be the centerpiece of the comics. It'd be really hard, though, if it was the GLA who were used as examples and were the only ones who got published. I don't care how much other folks liked it and/or how much money it made Marvel/Disney, it would grate on me. Sure, the other heroes still exist and I could always bring them into my games, but I could do that in Champions, too.

Anyway, I don't think I can stretch that metaphor any further without it snapping.
 


My response to High Level NPC in FR. Hmm Tom Cruise, and Beyoncé are high level Bards in the real world. Guess who is not going to help you with your high school production of Grease? Or that evil gang of country and western rappers who are shaking down your friends for their lunch money.
Now where was it every said the novels were canon? Especially for 5 E. Give me a statement, link, a quote from a designer of 5E, an Amazon gift card, etc supporting the idea that a dm MUST follow the novels. The only source books I know for 5E are DMG, PHB, MM, Sword Coast, Volo’s yo-yos Monsters, and the various adventure path hard backs.

I am having Knights of the Dinner Table flashbacks on this thread where Brian is griping the hackmaster novels may no sense game sense so the writer did not know his hackmaster canon.

“Doesn't matter. FR novels are canon. That's one of the things to love about the FR as a game setting.” Mirtek. Pray tell me where in the 5E books mentioned above that has this wording. Is Ed Greenwood going to show up at my house with his leather black jack of metal dice and discuss the errors of my ways?
What do I consider canon? Only the hardbacks as I dm them. The DMG, sword coast, MM, PHB, and volo’s. Even if I own the modules I don’t consider them canon till I dm them. And after seeing Greenwood wrote “Spellfire” none of the fiction books are canon. The creator of Star Wars can say this is canon but Wookie Christmas isn’t. Too bad unless he sitting at my table while I dming Star Wars the RPG he does not get a vote. His Canon is only a suggestion when I start dming.
 


I don't think it's unreasonable. I just think that it's easily resolved. For many, it won't even be an issue....no one playing even cares where Elminster is. Problem solved before it is even a problem, in this case. My players don't care about Elminster at all, and never expect him to show up, nor to they ever even consider going to him for help.

For other tables, it may be an issue, but it's one the DM can avoid. If you're running Tyranny of Dragons, and your players say "hey, where's Elminster in all this?", really all you have to reply with is "That's a good question....where is he?" and it's implied that something must have happened to him. Then you can continue on without even worrying about it.

Or, you can go one step further, and actually come up with a reason he's not involved. Let's say the Cult of the Dragon knew he would be an issue, so they dispatched some high level mages to deal with him, and he's been captured/killed/banished and cannot help with what's happening on the Sword Coast.

This is the same as mentioned above where Thor or the rest of the avengers are mysteriously absent from a world altering event with no explanation given. The just-shrug-and-ignore-it excuse is extremely lazy writing and bugs me in comics, movies and any other media.

One of the things about running an RPG is that you can have the characters react the way you want. The whole deal where you are yelling at the screen "No! Don't split up again are you stupid?! Someone dies every time you do that!" And then you get frustrated and angry and never watch that show again.

And yet I see people posting events in their game where they do exactly that because "Yes, I know it is a bad idea, but it is so classic to the genre I'm going to do it anyway." No! It is not classic! It is lazy writing! The author couldn't think of a good reason for the group to split, so he just had them randomly decide to do so for no reason, just to move the plot along. Arggh! It makes me crazy!

Sorry, I kinda got off track there... Back to the point...

Sure, you can ignore the obvious solutions to a problem "because they are too easy and don't tell a good story". And if your group is fine with that then of course there is no such thing as bad-wrong-fun. But for some of us if you want a good story, then make sure you have a good reason for us to not take the easy solution.

You have a have a bunch of Demon Lords invading the Underdark? Well we have a scroll of sending and my wizard met Khelben "Blackstaff" Arunsun as part of his background. Why wouldn't I just contact him and let him know? Why wouldn't he send a warning to Elminster? By the time of the final showdown I expect that all of the high-powered casters in the realms, along with their favorite meat shields, will be there to kick some serious ass.

TL;DR: I'm not going to do something stupid just to save your plot. But this gets to your next point.

Or, you can go two steps further, and come up with a reason he's not involved, and then make that part of your adventure. This would require a good deal of work on the DMs part, but some may like doing that, and it's certainly not required.

And I think this is again a reason why I don't think the criticism is all that strong, even if I recognize it as reasonable; you can involve your game in Realms lore as much or as little as you like. Played exactly as written, Tyranny of Dragons is a Realms game, but I don't think Elminster is ever a consideration (I only own the first book, so I could be wrong). A DM who is in the know can make passing mention of such characters. Or a DM who really thinks it will help his game or be cool for his players, can add these elements into the game.

Any level you go with...it's a game in the Realms.

Yep, you need a reason for why the heavy hitters are not going to bother saving the world. And the reason it is a valid criticism is that the published adventure paths don't seem to have any reason for them not to. The fact that Elminster is not even a consideration in the Tyranny of Dragons adventure line is the problem.

Honestly Elminster is always a problem. Now he has the same excuse as Superman or Thor, and that is that he can't be bothered by local events, and that makes sense. But for world shattering events there needs a reason. The usual cop out is "He is away on another plane", but that gets old after awhile.
 

The deck of many things is depending on the edition an artifact or magic item. As such it is encountered via adventuring. Any exp granted by it comes from adventuring, just like exp granted by gold in 1e came from adventuring. Adventuring is not just killing monsters, nor is that the only way to gain exp while adventuring.
No, and the god didn't give them to her. Those levels are never hers. Rather they are the god's or the temple's, depending on what the story about her gaining the temporary use of those levels actually is.

The Deck of Many Things is the proof of theory. I don’t own a vast collection of DnD material, I have to use what I have. It is a legendary item, it can grant XP. If a magic item can do it, a god can do it and demon lords and the like can do it under the correct circumstances.

If a gods power, which is locked within whatever temple this is by my reading, can grant temporary levels, then it seems there must be a way to grant permanent levels. And even if they can’t be permanent giving someone temporary power for 100 years accomplishes the same effect for most of the playable races.

If you want to keep insisting I am not providing proof that my theory is plausible, then fine, continue to deny that the gods cannot do anything more than give templates which grant spells and physical and mental changes, and that can never translate into actual level gain because that requires XP and the gods are never shown directly granting XP in a setting book.

Modules are not canon. Not because I don't want them to be, but because in general they just aren't. The same goes for novels. Look at Star Wars. Tons of novels with tons of great stories, but not canon. These FR novels and modules aren't canon unless the company actually makes those changes in the setting and/or adds those stories to setting supplements.
Nothing is canon unless the company explicitly says so. Many things are just farmed out to people to use the logo on, but aren't actually officially product history. Again, see Star Wars.

Star Wars is a very interesting example to bring up. Do you happen to remember when Force Awakens was announced? When they said the entire Expanded Universe was being declared non-canon and people flipped out?

If the novels were never considered canon, people would not have lost their minds. The novels were accepted canon by everyone involved until the movie studios decided to say otherwise.

Ed Greenwood has it in his contract that anything he says or writes about the Realms is canon, unless WoTC specifically says it is not. That means any realms product that has Ed’s name on it is canon, accepted by the company, until the company specifically calls out something as non-canon.

This is the official stance of the company and you cannot say it is not. Things beyond the setting book are canon. I’m sorry if that ruins things for you, but then… that is part of what we’ve been calling the problem isn’t it? That the canon FR has some serious issues.


That never happens from anything inherent to the FR, though. The high level NPCs don't appear in a single scene, ever, unless the DM puts them there. No high level NPC is watching what is going on, opting not to step in and stop it. There are no high level NPCs aware of all the happens, making weird that no high level NPC stepped in to stop it. The only way that will ever happen is if you have a bad DM.

It doesn’t take a bad DM. There are pitfalls everywhere.

Any “Save the Realms” plot that takes place brings up the question of why one of the premier guardians of the Realms (and it is a list longer than just Elminster and Driz’zt) is not getting involved. I mean, isn’t the whole plot of Out of the Abyss and Rise of Tiamat involve threats so great that multiple nations and organizations join forces? You don’t have to be paying very close attention to the world to notice that a threat has loomed that got the USA, Russia, China, India, ISIS and the Illuminati to work together.

But lets go smaller. Let’s say the plot is a necromancer attacking and threatening a city. Silverymoon… wait, isn’t the leader of Silverymoon an incredibly powerful wizard… uh, Waterdeep then…. No also has an incredibly powerful immortal wizard in charge…. Neverwinter? Isn’t there a full on order of Paladins based there…. Okay, small town, Secomber. *Wikis secomber* As long as the Famed sage and alchemist Amelior Amanitis is a non-combatant sage instead of a powerful wizard

And if you decide to go forward with one of these cities being in danger anyways, you need to carefully balance the level of threat. It can’t be a threat big enough to get the leader of the city involved, but it does need to be a big enough to threat to get your party involved and feel like they saved the city.

It can be done, but man is it aggravating to have to constantly balance these incredibly powerful people who could be doing something about the threats to the people, but somehow don’t, but are also not seen as lazy incompetents who refuse to protect their people, so that your players can be the stars of the show, but also probably not end up as the leader of any of the major cities, because the people there are powerful and well-loved heroes…

Do you really think a party of levels 1-15 can compete with an epic wizard like Raistlin?

Depends on what we mean by competing. If a level 1 party faces Raistlin directly no, if they face his minions then yes.

Look at the justice league. Batman shouldn't even be there according to this philosophy. Between Superman, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman and the Martian Manhunter, the rest of the League should be overshadowed and not even bother, and that's with the big guys actually present.........unlike what happens in the Forgotten Realms.

So because your party includes a level 20 wizard, barbarian, mystic and paladin it can’t include a level 20 rogue?

Does batman have super powers, no. Does he need them, no. Does this make him a bit of a mary sue character who is never truly in danger of losing, yes.

Two thoughts:
1. Maybe Superman just trusts Daredevil and is willing to let him handle it?
2. More importantly, in your example, Superman is constantly onscreen, reminding the audience of his presence. If he's not there, then there's no reason for the audience to think about him or even remember that he exists.
To take another example, I just (finally) saw Captain America: The Winter Soldier. This is a universe where there are far more powerful characters than Captain America, and yet that didn't make the movie less satisfying in any way.

Yeah, it can work. But I think it is easier to pull off in a 2 hour movie than a 2 year campaign.

Also, because I’m a bit of a nerd, the marvel movies have a few advantages. They haven’t put forth the entire roster yet, and by the time of Winter Soldier we really only had the Avengers team. Thor is off world, Hulk is unreliable and too dangerous, and Black Widow was a big part of that plot. That means the only person who could have gotten involved and is a significant game changer is Stark (War Machine is owned by the Army, and therefore compromised by the whole HYDRA thing anyways). Follow that with Cap delving into the secret spy network within the secret spy network, and we’ve got some plausible deniability that actually works.

And has this.
"Most are more inclined to agree with Greenwood as he is the 'father' of the Forgotten Realms. Furthermore, Ed Greenwood is the creator of the Forgotten Realms, and according to the original agreement between him and TSR, everything he writes and says regarding the Forgotten Realms is canon, unless or until superseded by published material from TSR or WotC."
I'm curious to see that agreement.

Are you asking that someone track down the contract written a few decades ago and signed by Ed Greenwood and TSR?

Because I seriously doubt anyone is going to do that. Like, at all.

My response to High Level NPC in FR. Hmm Tom Cruise, and Beyoncé are high level Bards in the real world. Guess who is not going to help you with your high school production of Grease? Or that evil gang of country and western rappers who are shaking down your friends for their lunch money.
Now where was it every said the novels were canon? Especially for 5 E. Give me a statement, link, a quote from a designer of 5E, an Amazon gift card, etc supporting the idea that a dm MUST follow the novels. The only source books I know for 5E are DMG, PHB, MM, Sword Coast, Volo’s yo-yos Monsters, and the various adventure path hard backs.

Post #805 has the link that explains every single novel is considered canon unless specified otherwise.

As for High school productions, you are completely correct, however, when you’re players are standing on the stage of the Grammies and “Anti-sound Bieber” shows up to destroy all music forever… won’t they wonder maybe a little, where the heck some of the biggest names in music are?

This isn’t a “Dang, Elminster keeps beating up the bandits” problem. This is a “If we’re saving the world from an evil goddess ripping through reality, what is the guy who’s supposed to be protecting reality doing?” problem. They are similar problems, but not the same.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top