Posted without comment. Or with little comment, at least. This from Descent into Avernus.
Use of a/an and consistent use (or omission, though I'll judge for that too) the Oxford comma are two of my peeves.
First, what a mess when aiming that into the wind. Second, it would be squinting. I am sure some would say it's technically peering. But go ahead and try to "peer" into a hot, hard wind and keep your eyes open.
Not sure if you are for or against the Oxford comma. I'm for it, but use or non-use of the Oxford comma is more a matter of style.
As I recall, * shake * shake * zip * is the somatic component for prestidigitation, so it's really not a problem.Well...if a guy can pee into the wind and not have it blow back on him, he's got the confidence of one who has a very powerful stream, is very well endowed, or both.
Then again, I'd probably be even more intimidated by the guy that was peeing into the wind, getting it blown back on him, and not caring.
"Peeling." The word "potatoes" is also missing.Given the context of the sentence, what word other than 'peeing' works?
There's another thread on the site where someone relates the story of an NPC who starved to death because he was always lying when asked if he was hungry...%Liar
Which Hargrave ran with in Arduin![]()
It's the * shake * * shake * that gets you in the end.As I recall, * shake * shake * zip * is the somatic component for prestidigitation, so it's really not a problem.
Not an official D&D rulebook, but an official TSR book, so it countsIn all of the original Dragonlance novels, they keep calling a halberd a "hauberk" Every time. Although, it is mighty impressive for Flint to cut a draconian in two with a hauberk...
Nowhere does it say it's a guyWell...if a guy can pee into the wind and not have it blow back on him, he's got the confidence of one who has a very powerful stream, is very well endowed, or both.
Then again, I'd probably be even more intimidated by the guy that was peeing into the wind, getting it blown back on him, and not caring.