• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E WotC's Jeremy Crawford on D&D Races Going Forward

On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty. @ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence...

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty.


636252771691385727.jpg


@ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence debuff and the evil alignment, with a more acceptable narrative. It's a start, but there's a fair argument for gutting the entire race system.

The orcs of Eberron and Wildemount reflect where our hearts are and indicate where we’re heading.


@vorpaldicepress I hate to be "that guy", but what about Drow, Vistani, and the other troublesome races and cultures in Forgotten Realms (like the Gur, another Roma-inspired race)? Things don't change over night, but are these on the radar?

The drow, Vistani, and many other folk in the game are on our radar. The same spirit that motivated our portrayal of orcs in Eberron is animating our work on all these peoples.


@MileyMan1066 Good. These problems need to be addressed. The variant features UA could have a sequel that includes notes that could rectify some of the problems and help move 5e in a better direction.

Addressing these issues is vital to us. Eberron and Wildemount are the first of multiple books that will face these issues head on and will do so from multiple angles.


@mbriddell I'm happy to hear that you are taking a serious look at this. Do you feel that you can achieve this within the context of Forgotten Realms, given how establised that world's lore is, or would you need to establish a new setting to do this?

Thankfully, the core setting of D&D is the multiverse, with its multitude of worlds. We can tell so many different stories, with different perspectives, in each world. And when we return to a world like FR, stories can evolve. In short, even the older worlds can improve.


@SlyFlourish I could see gnolls being treated differently in other worlds, particularly when they’re a playable race. The idea that they’re spawned hyenas who fed on demon-touched rotten meat feels like they’re in a different class than drow, orcs, goblins and the like. Same with minotaurs.

Internally, we feel that the gnolls in the MM are mistyped. Given their story, they should be fiends, not humanoids. In contrast, the gnolls of Eberron are humanoids, a people with moral and cultural expansiveness.


@MikeyMan1066 I agree. Any creature with the Humanoid type should have the full capacity to be any alignmnet, i.e., they should have free will and souls. Gnolls... the way they are described, do not. Having them be minor demons would clear a lot of this up.

You just described our team's perspective exactly.


As a side-note, the term 'race' is starting to fall out of favor in tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder has "ancestry", and other games use terms like "heritage"); while he doesn't comment on that specifically, he doesn't use the word 'race' and instead refers to 'folks' and 'peoples'.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zardnaar

Legend
A quick search on Google shows that racists love the Crusades (smiting darker people really is appealing to them, you know?), Sparta-by-way-of-300, Vikings (so much so that the new Kickstarter for the Beowulf RPG had to explicitly distance itself from them) and other stuff.

That doesn't mean it's impossible to be interested in or enjoy that stuff (I love me some Beowulf, personally), but I think you have to acknowledge that the racists have become super-fans of their interpretations of these real life events and cultures and wrap themselves in their version of related symbolism.

2/3 of those pantheons are in the phb.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Zardnaar

Legend
European Islamaphobia is rooted in racism.

Probably more religious.

Muhammad was seen as a heretic in contemporary sources.

Early Christian churches stronghold was in the east, it spread in Levant before heading west.

After Muhammad died they didn't expand peacefully. Parts of the west were still pagan well into the 10th century with the last hold outs lingering into the 15th and perhaps longer.
 




Dire Bare

Legend
Let's play a game of... spot the racism!

View attachment 122923

1. The card is called Crusade.
2. They all have christian crosses on as their emblem.
3. They're raising swords in triumph as the foreground burns.
4. All "white" creatures gain +1.

If you don't get why the 4 points above equal a symbol for white supremacy, then I can't help you.
Honestly, the context is irrelevant here. The card is depicted in a way that, intentionally or not, has made it a symbol among MtG players who are also racists.

It doesn't matter if the "white" is the mana color or whatever; the card is a symbol of racism used by racists, and deserves the ban.

Context is everything. Context is why this card was banned. You claim that the card is now a symbol for racists among Magic players . . . . do you have a link to back that up? First I've heard of it.

Don't get me wrong, WotC was right to remove those 7 cards from the game. The confluence of card name, imagery, and game effect for "Crusade" is definitely something we don't need in Magic. Same for the other 6 cards on the list (Invoke Prejudice, Cleanse, Stone-Throwing Devils, Pradesh Gypsies, Jihad, and Imprison). "Invoke Prejudice" actually does have a sad, racist story behind the artwork for the card, although that wasn't known to the designers at the time (the artist is a whack-job white supremacist who loves putting coded, racist messages in his art).

But, do you have any evidence that this card was a deliberate racist dog-whistle rather than an unfortunate and inadvertent series of choices? Do you have any evidence of racist Magic players using any of these cards as symbols of their beliefs?

Bringing it back to D&D . . . . . the way D&D frames the fantasy races is problematic and racist. But was that the intent of Gygax, Arneson, and other creators? Or just inadvertently passing along racist tropes from mythology and literature? Either way, we need to acknowledge it and change it, but the intent behind the problem isn't meaningless.

EDIT: I am feeling sad that some folks here are looking at these 7 cards and saying, "What's the problem? How is this racist?" Wow, just wow.
 

Probably more religious.

Muhammad was seen as a heretic in contemporary sources.

Early Christian churches stronghold was in the east, it spread in Levant before heading west.

After Muhammad died they didn't expand peacefully. Parts of the west were still pagan well into the 10th century with the last hold outs lingering into the 15th and perhaps longer.

It is difficult to have a civil discussion about the history on these topics, but I agree both sides of the crusades/jihads were horrific.
 

Var

Explorer
As far as DnD races are concerned I'd very much like races to be more distinct in their physical aspects.
I'm game to remove all mental mods from classes altogether, you're not really capped by race in how much of a prodigy Wizard/Bard/Druid you can be. DEX, STR, CON however are a bit problematic when the three ft40 pound Gnome can match the 7 ft Goliath or the 200 pound dwarf because of game mechanics.
I don't want to lock i.e. small races out of being effective fighty men. However I'd really appreaciate a creative solution that makes up for the lack of a mechanical +1 to rolls. Looking for an example the Edge mechanic from Shadowrun 5E (combined with a higher chargen cost for other races) did a pretty good job at making it an interesting choice if your melee guy was going to be a Troll, Orc, Dwarf or Hu interesting.

On the offtopic side. Do we want to talk about how all previous civilisations had slave labor? Babylon, Egypt, the Greek states, China, India, the Mongols, Alexander's Empire and ofc history's poster child the Romans (other than biblical coverage). I'm not going to sit here and defend that, because there honestly is no point. You'd have been hard pressed to explain to a Roman citizen how having Sarmatian and Nubian slaves could possibly be wrong, that's how things had been for millenia at this point. Does not translate well into today's world.
However there is in all but name state sanctioned slave labor in US prisons. The 13th amendment explicitly exempts "puishment for convicted crime" from the bar on slavery. Well I'm not from across the pond, but from how often I've accidentially seen coverage about privatized prisons, lack of effort/interest to rehabilitate etc, from a supposedly first world country on another continent that makes me wonder about priorities.
We might get a bit too hung up on the Magic cards and tough to fill quotas for equality, before questioning the intentions and validity of the source material sometimes.


It is difficult to have a civil discussion about the history on these topics, but I agree both sides of the crusades/jihads were horrific.
Lack of information and education has really made it very easy to whip up a population into the carnage that is war before media and public available schooling became a thing.
Although even history is written by the victors and those who come after and their opinion on them. I've never seen a history book mention the actions of a culture in the antique with more than a hint of judgement. The Punic Wars are taught as an interesting time or anectdote rather than a cataclysmic tragedy for the Carthage population. Turned into one of the bigger ethnic cleanses in history.
Which is fine by me, I can't directly relate to the problems at the time, a more or less neutral narrator providing a story to judge for myself fits the bill.
Events with religion involved tend to have more judgemental narration. Not even talking about all the ethnic cleansing done in the name of one deity or another (often covering for politics).
 
Last edited:


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top