They tell about the biological differences between the species. Like a strong and tough species probably generally approaches things somewhat differently than smart and agile one. Like you know, how bears and foxes behave differently.
Exactly.
wookies pull people’s arms out of sockets when angry, etc.
if all you have is a tall hairy guy? I dunno.
and species is the operative word. Different species do have different abilities and physical ability.
I am just not identifying with the outrage in a game predicated on cracking the skulls of sentient beings to succeed and survive.
murder? Ok. Acknowledging real differences between creatures is what gets dropped as going too far?
No. Go ahead if you want. I know some people will roll with that and it’s fine just does not seem nearly interesting with all the sameness.
I have always enjoyed playing against type. When we homogenize races/species and culture, all that goes away.
can we even say tieflings have infernal heritage? That yuan-ti are reptilian sociopaths (generally?).
Deep down maybe D&D is just not the game people are looking for.
I know, I know. Mearls and WOTC want to“fire” people who don’t conform. Where’s my pink slip? Give me two copies. One to take a dump on and one to wipe my a** with.
If we have to toil to decide what an Orc is
allowed to be, its already jacked up.
Orcs were fine a few months ago. I think this is absolutely reactionary. But what is unfortunate is that rash decisions can start to dilute a great game that has stood the test of time. Now maybe
I am being reactionary. Maybe this roll will get slowed.