D&D 5E Ideas for Unique Ranger Spells and Magic

Well, my thoughts are primarily druid with minor arcane, and it could even be exclusively "natural", but I know others have their own opinions of course. :D

Didn't 1E only require the druid to have mistletoe/Holley/nightshade (think they are all one in the same) to cast spells? So I guess that would be natural and don't disagree. The Ranger should fall under the same. But at some point they got lumped in with divine intervention. I never agreed with either the druid or the ranger getting their spells from arcane means.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Didn't 1E only require the druid to have mistletoe/Holley/nightshade (think they are all one in the same) to cast spells? So I guess that would be natural and don't disagree. The Ranger should fall under the same. But at some point they got lumped in with divine intervention. I never agreed with either the druid or the ranger getting their spells from arcane means.
Testing your quote to push notification. Hope it works for you.
 


This thread had got me thinking. If I had to make a ruling in my game if a player asked me where does my rangers/druids "magical" powers come from? I think I would answer as such,

Its not from a divine being, the elements in a supernatural way, or some hokey philosophy, but nature. Watching a heard of bison cross a plain would teach them how to navigate their environment. Watching birds or deer would show them how camouflage themselves. If they want to start a magical fire, get something flammable from your environment, two sticks and you'll start a bonfire bigger than any lay person. You get your magic by harnessing the environment of your immediate surroundings. So for a wilderness ranger or druid, its mud, water, a dead snake skull. If you're an urban ranger or druid its a building brick, or the sign from a market place stall.
 

So it begs the question where does its powers actually come from

I always saw it as a collection of secrets gathered from their travels. Tricks picked up here and there over generations of rangers bringing back tricks of the trade.

Like in a very crunchy D&D, rangers would get secret points and spent them to get spells.

"Required" spells would cost 1 point
Traditional ranger spells would cost 2 points
Druid spells would cost 3 points
Wizard spells would cost 4 points
Any divination spell would cost 4 points
Paladin spells would cost 4 points

You'd get like X secret points per level. Different archetypes would discount spells or unlock ones.
 

One thing that I never understood about the Ranger, whats with the Grizzly Adams, BJ and the Bear animal companion thing? Is he a loner walking through life alone with nothing more than a Chimpanzee at his side? Again as you said makes the class hard to pin down. Anyone Ive ever seen play a Ranger with an animal companion buried that thing within two or three games. Im gonna send Scraps into battle and it always ends up on the wrong end of a lightning bolt.
I’ve never had a player bury their animal companion. “Scraps” is almost always an integral part of the team, often a sort of mascot, but always important throughout the campaign.
 

I always saw it as a collection of secrets gathered from their travels. Tricks picked up here and there over generations of rangers bringing back tricks of the trade.

Like in a very crunchy D&D, rangers would get secret points and spent them to get spells.

"Required" spells would cost 1 point
Traditional ranger spells would cost 2 points
Druid spells would cost 3 points
Wizard spells would cost 4 points
Any divination spell would cost 4 points
Paladin spells would cost 4 points
In a less crunchy 5e, Ritual Casting is a good start, IMO.
 

I’ve never had a player bury their animal companion. “Scraps” is almost always an integral part of the team, often a sort of mascot, but always important throughout the campaign.

I get the mascot thing, I wish my players were smarter, give them a good name, some armor and jerky treats. But they always treat them as expendable. Ranger: Bonkers...go scout over the next ridge. Ranger: Bonkers....Bonkers? Ranger (turns to Party)...Theres no reply from Bonkers. Then they wonder why the animal companion dies all the time.
 

I get the mascot thing, I wish my players were smarter, give them a good name, some armor and jerky treats. But they always treat them as expendable. Ranger: Bonkers...go scout over the next ridge. Ranger: Bonkers....Bonkers? Ranger (turns to Party)...Theres no reply from Bonkers. Then they wonder why the animal companion dies all the time.

Sounds like a beast master as opposed to a ranger with an animal companion. Animal as tool vs. animal as friend. Both make sense to me.
 


Remove ads

Top