D&D General Naming the Barbarian? [added battlerager]

What name do you prefer for the class?

  • Barbarian

    Votes: 60 42.3%
  • Berserker

    Votes: 58 40.8%
  • Ravager

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • Rager

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Battlerager

    Votes: 10 7.0%

As I much as I tend to hate this kind of "woke culture" kind of stuff
What on earth are you talking about? Much as I am a proponent of inclusivity, this isn’t even vaguely an example of it.

(Actuallly, don’t answer that; I can’t see it going well)
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Battlerager feels like it fits if you take all the cultural, wilderness, and "uncivilized" aspects out of the class.
The class abilities have none of that. It's all attacks, rages, and critical. I can totally see a high elven 'battlerager'. All that stuff seems to be in the subclasses, not the barbarian itself.
 



"Battlerager" feels like a better version of "rager" - it still seems a bit video-game-y; in that it's a made-up word for the concept. DnD classes, traditionally, have been names for existing fantasy concepts re-purposed to meet the needs of the game (often slowly, over several iterations), rather than brand new words. At least for classes. Subclasses are new words.
 


The class abilities have none of that. It's all attacks, rages, and critical. I can totally see a high elven 'battlerager'. All that stuff seems to be in the subclasses, not the barbarian itself.
Rager seems too angry. Need to be more cheerful Battleraver. You could put to music.
 


The class abilities have none of that. It's all attacks, rages, and critical. I can totally see a high elven 'battlerager'. All that stuff seems to be in the subclasses, not the barbarian itself.

That's what I mean.
The battlerager would lack many of the barbarian subclasses and reflavor the reminder.
 

Remove ads

Top