The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[Gradine]

Fatback's better

 

[dragoner]

Honestly, I had sworn off bacon for a while now, though I have hospice going on in my house, and they want bacon, so bacon it is.

 

[Cadence]

Given how it keeps wanting to show up in threads and disrupt them, is alignment itself chaotic?

 

[prabe]

Given how it keeps wanting to show up in threads and disrupt them, is alignment itself chaotic?

Alignment is from some Other Place incompatible with rationality. Either that, or the urge to run D&D without it is.

 

[Levistus's_Leviathan]

Given how it keeps wanting to show up in threads and disrupt them, is alignment itself chaotic?

I thought that we all collectively decided that its alignment was "avocado?"

 

[Cadence]

I thought that we all collectively decided that its alignment was "avocado?"

I assume that's better than pineapple aligned alignment!

 

[Levistus's_Leviathan]

I assume that's better than pineapple aligned alignment!

Not if you're Aztec.

 

[Levistus's_Leviathan]

You know, none of these "Spelljammer Confirmed"-spinoff jokes are quite as good as the original. Maybe it's because a lot of people thought that Spelljammer was the least likely setting to ever be updated to a new system, but it finally did? Which means that practically any previous campaign setting could be brought back next, right?

 

[Parmandur]

You know, none of these "Spelljammer Confirmed"-spinoff jokes are quite as good as the original. Maybe it's because a lot of people thought that Spelljammer was the least likely setting to ever be updated to a new system, but it finally did? Which means that practically any previous campaign setting could be brought back next, right?

Similar to Magic coming back to Kamigawa, one of the proverbial "that will never happen" deals. Now, anything is possible.

 

[Benjamin Olson]

Given how it keeps wanting to show up in threads and disrupt them, is alignment itself chaotic?

I'm pretty sure alignment's alignment is lawful stupid.