D&D Celebrity Satine Phoenix & Husband Jamison Stone Accused Of Abuse Towards Freelancers

Status
Not open for further replies.
D&D influencer Satine Phoenix, and her husband Jamison Stone, who run tabletop gaming company Apotheosis Studios, have been accused of abusive behavior towards freelancers and contracted workers.

Satine Phoenix is a well-known D&D personality and creator, and was the D&D Community Manager for about a year back in 2018. Both she and Stone have appeared in many events and streaming shows, and have worked with WotC, Geek & Sundry, and other companies. Recently their Kickstarter campaign Sirens: Battle of the Bards raised over $300,000. At GaryCon, a US gaming convention, the couple held a public wedding.

sirens.jpg

Accusations were initially leveled last week against Stone by tattooist Chad Rowe, who tweeted about the abusive way in which Stone, as his client at the time, treated him. The artist was "insulted, berated, and talked down to as if I was a lesser person". Other reports started to roll in as people shared similar experiences, with people revealing how they had been bullied by them, and how the pair frequently portrayed themselves as 'better' than those they worked with. At the time of writing there have been many such reports including one from voice actress and designer Liisa Lee who was subjected to underhanded business practices by Phoenix and her then partner Ruty Rutenberg. Others indicated difficulties in getting paid for work done for Stone and Phoenix or their company.

Lysa Penrose reported on problematic interactions while Phoenix worked at WotC, who was the primary point of contact regarding a report of abuse. Penrose reports that Phoenix failed to pass on the reports of abuse, and continued to publicly associate with the abuser.

Jamison Stone has since resigned as CEO of Apotheosis Studios (though the pair do own the company) and issued a long apology which has been widely criticized. Phoenix released a statement about a week later. Screenshots leaked from a private channel indicate that they have adopted a strategy of shifting the blame onto Stone, so that Phoenix's public image remain intact, with Stone writing “I also am ensuring behind the scenes ... we shield Satine as much as physically possible from damage.”

D&D In A Castle, which is an event which hosts D&D games run by professional DMs in a weekend break in a castle, has dropped the pair from its lineup, as has Jasper's Game Day, an organization which works to prevent suicides. Origins Game Fair, at which the couple are celebrity guests, removed Stone from its guest list, but not Phoenix, stating that "staff assessed that there was no immediate risk of physical harm".

According to ComicBook.com. former collaborator of Phoenix, Ruty Rutenberg, is suing Phoenix, alleging misappropriation of $40,000 of stream network Maze Arcana's money.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I mean, the trouble is thst if you do the opposite, things are even worse and more toxic. Making the world safe for people to come forward is the way to enact paoitive change, not assuming that everyone who associates with abusers at any level is morally complicit.

I mean, Tito may be morally complicit, but we can't assume that sight unseen.

What's "do the opposite"? Are you really arguing that the only possible alternative to the Missing Stair Cinematic Universe is to presume evil motive as the default?

You're right, we can't assume things sight unseen. That includes assuming 'he meant well' and 'he was confused' and 'he was misled' or whatever other fanfic allows us not to have to perform the uncomfortable task of thinking ill of a fellow gamer.

Liisa explained at length what Z did. It wasn't "associating with Satine".
 

log in or register to remove this ad

This is purely supposition, but based on some of the first-hand stories coming out and the lawsuit, I think it possible that they co-mingled project funds with personal funds.

Possible, but it may not even be that squirrely. There are all sorts of ways a project can run over-budget that aren't outright financial malfeasance. But when you run over budget on a fixed price, someone doesn't get paid.
 


Possible, but it may not even be that squirrely. There are all sorts of ways a project can run over-budget that aren't outright financial malfeasance. But when you run over budget on a fixed price, someone doesn't get paid.

Sure, but when it happens on almost every project? I'm a little skeptical about the answer being an "honest" mistake.
 


What's "do the opposite"? Are you really arguing that the only possible alternative to the Missing Stair Cinematic Universe is to presume evil motive as the default?

You're right, we can't assume things sight unseen. That includes assuming 'he meant well' and 'he was confused' and 'he was misled' or whatever other fanfic allows us not to have to perform the uncomfortable task of thinking ill of a fellow gamer.

Liisa explained at length what Z did. It wasn't "associating with Satine".
It was "believe Satine's side of the story." Which was wrong. But it's not always easy for people to see clearly when someone they like is positioning someone else they barely know as a villain.

Maybe Tito is a psycho abuser, for all I know, but I see no reason to assume that for certain just because he believed a manipulative narcissist.
 
Last edited:

I guess they are so full of their ego that they literally thought no one would ever stand up against them, so they started doing more and more missteps, leaving their flanks exposed.

I mean, she proudly used that "Queen of D&D" title like it was something real. They even managed to organise a sort of royal wedding, getting married at a convention named after the founding father of the hobby in a ceremony administered by that founding father's natural son.

And I'm glad all of this finally surfaced, but that's again another one of those situations that exploded too late: people are still coming out with their stories and many of them had their dreams destroyed by those two.

I really, really hope that both get the flak they absolutely deserve and that that pathetic excuse from her, pointing to Jamison as the only culprit, doesn't actually shield her. But it seems more and more evident she's already 'out of the game' (in many senses).
 

I mean, she proudly used that "Queen of D&D" title like it was something real. They even managed to organise a sort of royal wedding, getting married at a convention named after the founding father of the hobby in a ceremony administered by that founding father's natural son.
Has Luke said anything about the matter yet?
 


It was "believe Satine's side of the story." Which was wrong. But it's not always easy for people to see clearly when someone they like is positioning someone else they barely know as a villain.

Maybe Tito is a psycho abuser, for all I know, but I see no reason to assume that for certain just because he believed a manipulative narcissist.
A factor that should be kept in mind is that several years ago Satine was in a terrible car accident by her own account left her with severe brain damage. Would not be surprised that a lot of people, especially individuals at WotC, would give her the benefit of the doubt due that. Not saying that is right, but it would understand that some behaviour would put down to the injury she received in that accident.

Used to work with a guy that after a stoke started swearing like a sailor. Everyone just put it down to the stoke. Not the same, I know, but an example how people can make allowance for behaviour if they think there is a medical justification.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top