LOL, I'd rather have someone competent than a petulant oligarch that's out of touch with reality.
Gimme a villain with style and grace, and a little bit of fencing skill.
LOL, I'd rather have someone competent than a petulant oligarch that's out of touch with reality.
You would be wrong then.I mean, we joke about the whole casual/hardcore/gatekeeping topic, but is there even a 'hardcore' scene for 5e?? I really just cannot see it, certainly not out of the box.
I dont see how it needs to be all or nothing, or that by providing one thing, additional things cannot also be accounted for.
But just because you need something (or me) doesn't mean the fanbase at large does or that it is a good idea.
They used to be angular, sneering, and bald...Gimme a villain with style and grace, and a little bit of fencing skill.
You would be wrong then.
Kinda over these billionaires. 1917 is starting to make some amount of sense.What an unfortunate choice of example for a visionary leader![]()
I'm thinking more along the lines of 1793.Kinda over these billionaires. 1917 is starting to make some amount of sense.